Suppr超能文献

对送餐上门的渴望:澳大利亚一个在线食品配送平台上完整菜单营养质量的横断面分析。

Hunger for Home Delivery: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nutritional Quality of Complete Menus on an Online Food Delivery Platform in Australia.

作者信息

Wang Celina, Korai Andriana, Jia Si Si, Allman-Farinelli Margaret, Chan Virginia, Roy Rajshri, Raeside Rebecca, Phongsavan Philayrath, Redfern Julie, Gibson Alice A, Partridge Stephanie R

机构信息

Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Mar 11;13(3):905. doi: 10.3390/nu13030905.

Abstract

Online food delivery (OFD) platforms have changed how consumers purchase food prepared outside of home by capitalising on convenience and smartphone technology. Independent food outlets encompass a substantial proportion of partnering outlets, but their offerings' nutritional quality is understudied. Little is also known as to how OFD platforms influence consumer choice. This study evaluated the nutritional quality and marketing attributes of offerings from independent takeaway outlets available on Sydney's market-leading OFD platform (UberEats). Complete menus and marketing attributes from 202 popular outlets were collected using web scraping. All 13841 menu items were classified into 38 food and beverage categories based on the Australian Dietary Guidelines. Of complete menus, 80.5% (11,139/13,841) were discretionary and 42.3% (5849/13,841) were discretionary cereal-based mixed meals, the largest of the 38 categories. Discretionary menu items were more likely to be categorised as most popular (OR: 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.2), accompanied by an image (OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5) and offered as a value bundle (OR: 6.5, 95% CI 4.8-8.9). Two of the three discretionary food categories were more expensive than their healthier Five Food Group counterparts ( < 0.02). The ubiquity of discretionary choices offered by independent takeaways and the marketing attributes employed by OFD platforms has implications for public health policy. Further research on the contribution of discretionary choices and marketing attributes to nutritional intakes is warranted.

摘要

在线食品配送(OFD)平台通过利用便利性和智能手机技术,改变了消费者购买外出准备食品的方式。独立食品店在合作店铺中占很大比例,但其提供食品的营养质量研究不足。对于OFD平台如何影响消费者选择也知之甚少。本研究评估了悉尼领先的OFD平台(优步外卖)上独立外卖店提供食品的营养质量和营销属性。使用网络爬虫收集了202家热门店铺的完整菜单和营销属性。根据澳大利亚饮食指南,将所有13841个菜单项分为38个食品和饮料类别。在完整菜单中,80.5%(11139/13841)为自由支配类,42.3%(5849/13841)为基于谷物的自由支配混合餐,是38个类别中占比最大的。自由支配类菜单项更有可能被归类为最受欢迎(比值比:2.5,95%置信区间1.9 - 3.2),配有图片(比值比:1.3,95%置信区间1.2 - 1.5)并作为超值套餐提供(比值比:6.5,95%置信区间4.8 - 8.9)。三个自由支配食品类别中有两个比更健康的五大食物组对应类别更贵(P < 0.02)。独立外卖提供的自由支配选择的普遍性以及OFD平台采用的营销属性对公共卫生政策具有影响。有必要进一步研究自由支配选择和营销属性对营养摄入的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a235/8002002/fb8ed353d8a2/nutrients-13-00905-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验