Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical university of Košice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia.
Energy Cluster of Prešov Region, Levočská 12, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 27;18(7):3472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073472.
The implementation of industrial park investment projects in relation to the use of brownfields and greenfields is a constantly debated issue. Brownfields are unused areas, often with devastated building objects and environmental burden that pose potential risks to the investor but also contain the possibility of using the available infrastructure and facilities for the use of the proposed investment project. The objective of the study was to assess the positive and negative investment of these types of sites based on the available information on the possibilities of investing in the implementation of the brownfield industrial park compared to the greenfield in the western part of East Slovak region and to identify a more appropriate alternative of investing. Based on the assessment of investment in the industrial parks, the appropriateness of the allocation of investment capital was assessed through the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The SAW approach allows us to objectivize the weighting value of selected factors and thus assess the appropriateness of the allocation of investment capital. Based on the results, it is more advantageous to allocate the investment capital to the greenfield as the return on investment of the project expressed as a percentage of the average annual profit was 9.5%, compared to brownfield with only 2.9%.
工业园区投资项目的实施涉及棕地和绿地的利用，这是一个备受争议的问题。棕地是未使用的区域，通常有被破坏的建筑物和环境负担，对投资者构成潜在风险，但也有可能利用现有基础设施和设施来实施拟议的投资项目。本研究的目的是根据在斯洛伐克东部西部地区实施棕地工业园区投资的可能性方面的现有信息，评估这些类型场地的投资的正负效益，并确定更合适的投资替代方案。基于对工业园区的投资评估，通过简单加性加权（SAW）方法评估投资资本配置的适当性。SAW 方法允许我们客观化所选因素的加权值，从而评估投资资本配置的适当性。基于结果，将投资资本分配给绿地更为有利，因为项目的投资回报率（以平均年利润的百分比表示）为 9.5%，而棕地仅为 2.9%。
