Lundmark Hedman Frida, Berg Charlotte, Stéen Margareta
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 532 23 Skara, Sweden.
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7011, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;11(10):2901. doi: 10.3390/ani11102901.
Sweden is often seen as a leading country in animal welfare and legislation, but some recent amendments to the legislation are perceived as relaxing animal welfare requirements in order to improve the competitiveness of the relevant industry and of farmers. In this study, we analysed the suggested and actual changes in the Swedish national animal welfare regulations relating to horses, cattle and pigs between 1988 and 2019 and the consequences for the intended animal welfare level. The regulations and amendments, including the proposals, the written motivations, the stakeholders' written responses to the proposed amendments and the final amendments, were scrutinised in detail. A sample of 77 requirements was then selected to assess whether and how the animal welfare level was affected by these legislative changes. The results indicated that the animal welfare protection level for cattle, pigs and horses increased overall during the 30-year period, but that a number of specific requirements had been relaxed to meet objectives other than animal welfare. It was more difficult to determine whether animal welfare improved in practice during the same period, due to the lack of systematic evaluations of the consequences of amending the regulations. Future evaluations are needed to evaluate the outcome of new legislative requirements and to monitor whether they serve their purpose in practice.
瑞典常被视为动物福利和立法方面的领先国家,但最近对立法的一些修订被认为是在放宽动物福利要求,以提高相关行业和农民的竞争力。在本研究中,我们分析了1988年至2019年间瑞典国家动物福利法规中与马、牛和猪相关的建议性和实际性变化,以及对预期动物福利水平的影响。我们详细审查了这些法规和修订案,包括提案、书面动机、利益相关者对修订提案的书面回应以及最终修订案。然后选取了77项要求的样本,以评估动物福利水平是否以及如何受到这些立法变化的影响。结果表明,在这30年期间,牛、猪和马的动物福利保护水平总体上有所提高,但为了实现动物福利以外的目标,一些具体要求被放宽了。由于缺乏对法规修订后果的系统评估,很难确定同期动物福利在实际中是否得到改善。未来需要进行评估,以评估新立法要求的结果,并监测它们在实际中是否达到目的。