Clemente Filipe Manuel, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Sarmento Hugo
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 18;9(3):345. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030345.
This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of small-sided games (SSGs)-based programs on the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of untrained hypertensive adults. The data sources utilized were Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. The eligibility criteria were: (i) randomized controlled trials including a control group and an intervention group exclusively using soccer SSGs; (ii) intervention and control groups including an untrained hypertensive adult population; (iii) articles written in English; and (iv) only full-text and original articles. The database search initially identified 241 titles. From those, five articles were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The included randomized controlled studies involved five individual experimental groups and 88 participants, and 68 participants in the five control groups. The results showed a large and beneficial effect of SSG on systolic (ES = 1.69; 95% CI = 0.71 to 2.66; 0.001; = 85.2%; Egger's test = 0.101) and diastolic blood pressure (ES = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.44 to 3.06; 0.001; = 74.8%; Egger's test = 0.118) when compared to the control groups. The findings of the current systematic review and meta-analysis revealed consistent beneficial effects of recreational soccer SSGs on untrained men and women from the hypertensive population, although high levels of heterogeneity.
本项系统评价及荟萃分析旨在评估基于小型比赛(SSGs)的项目对未经训练的高血压成年患者收缩压和舒张压的影响。所使用的数据来源包括Web of Science、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和PubMed。纳入标准为:(i)随机对照试验,包括仅使用足球SSGs的对照组和干预组;(ii)干预组和对照组均包括未经训练的高血压成年人群;(iii)英文撰写的文章;(iv)仅全文和原始文章。数据库检索最初识别出241个标题。其中,五篇文章符合系统评价和荟萃分析的条件。纳入的随机对照研究涉及五个独立实验组和88名参与者,以及五个对照组中的68名参与者。结果显示,与对照组相比,SSG对收缩压(效应量=1.69;95%置信区间=0.71至2.66;P<0.001;I²=85.2%;Egger检验P=0.101)和舒张压(效应量=2.25;95%置信区间=1.44至3.06;P<0.001;I²=74.8%;Egger检验P=0.118)有显著有益影响。当前系统评价和荟萃分析的结果显示,娱乐性足球SSG对高血压人群中未经训练的男性和女性具有一致的有益影响,尽管存在高度异质性。