Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Lisboa, Portugal.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 12;16(2):e0247067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247067. eCollection 2021.
This umbrella review was conducted to summarize the evidence and qualify the methodological quality of SR and SRMA published on small-sided games in team ball sports.
A systematic review of Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
From the 176 studies initially identified, 12 (eight SR and four SRMA) were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Methodological quality (with the use of AMSTAR-2) revealed that seven reviews had low quality and five had critically low quality. Two major types of effects of SSGs were observed: (i) short-term acute effects and (ii) long-term adaptations. Four broad dimensions of analysis were found: (i) physiological demands (internal load); (ii) physical demands (external load) or fitness status; (iii) technical actions; and (iv) tactical behavior and collective organization. The psychological domain was reduced to an analysis of enjoyment. The main findings from this umbrella review revealed that SSGs present positive effects in improving aerobic capacity and tactical/technical behaviors, while neuromuscular adaptations present more heterogeneous findings. Factors such as sex, age group, expertise, skill level, or fitness status are also determinants of some acute effects and adaptations.
The current umbrella review allowed to identify that most of the systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in SSGs presents low methodological quality considering the standards. Most of the systematic reviews included in this umbrella revealed that task constraints significantly change the acute responses in exercise, while SSGs are effective in improving aerobic capacity. Future original studies in this topic should improve the methodological quality and improve the experimental study designs for assessing changes in tactical/technical skills.
本伞式综述旨在总结小型化游戏在团队球类运动中发表的系统评价和系统评价更新的证据,并对其方法学质量进行评估。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对 Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 SPORTDiscus 数据库进行了系统综述。
从最初确定的 176 项研究中,有 12 项(8 项系统评价和 4 项系统评价更新)进行了全面审查,并提取和分析了其结局指标。方法学质量(使用 AMSTAR-2)显示,7 项综述质量较低,5 项质量极低。观察到 SSG 的两种主要影响类型:(i)短期急性影响和(ii)长期适应。发现了四个广泛的分析维度:(i)生理需求(内部负荷);(ii)物理需求(外部负荷)或健康状态;(iii)技术动作;以及(iv)战术行为和集体组织。心理领域被简化为对享受的分析。本伞式综述的主要发现表明,SSG 对提高有氧能力和战术/技术行为具有积极影响,而神经肌肉适应的结果则更加多样化。性别、年龄组、专业知识、技能水平或健康状态等因素也是一些急性影响和适应的决定因素。
目前的伞式综述表明,考虑到标准,大多数在 SSG 中进行的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量较低。本伞式综述中纳入的大多数系统评价表明,任务约束显著改变运动中的急性反应,而 SSG 有效提高有氧能力。未来在这一主题的原始研究应提高方法学质量,并改进评估战术/技术技能变化的实验研究设计。