• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年创伤患者死亡风险评分:一种用于预测老年创伤患者院内死亡率的简易工具的开发

The GERtality Score: The Development of a Simple Tool to Help Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients.

作者信息

Scherer Julian, Kalbas Yannik, Ziegenhain Franziska, Neuhaus Valentin, Lefering Rolf, Teuben Michel, Sprengel Kai, Pape Hans-Christoph, Jensen Kai Oliver

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, University Hospital of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, 58453 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 25;10(7):1362. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071362.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10071362
PMID:33806240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8037079/
Abstract

Feasible and predictive scoring systems for severely injured geriatric patients are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in severely injured geriatric trauma patients. The TraumaRegister DGU (TR-DGU) was utilized. European geriatric patients (≥65 years) admitted between 2008 and 2017 were included. Relevant patient variables were implemented in the GERtality score. By conducting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, a comparison with the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC-II) Score was performed. A total of 58,055 geriatric trauma patients (mean age: 77 years) were included. Univariable analysis led to the following variables: age ≥ 80 years, need for packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion prior to intensive care unit (ICU), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 13, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in any body region ≥ 4. The maximum GERtality score was 5 points. A mortality rate of 72.4% was calculated in patients with the maximum GERtality score. Mortality rates of 65.1 and 47.5% were encountered in patients with GERtality scores of 4 and 3 points, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the novel GERtality score was 0.803 (GTOS: 0.784; RISC-II: 0.879). The novel GERtality score is a simple and feasible score that enables an adequate prediction of the probability of mortality in polytraumatized geriatric patients by using only five specific parameters.

摘要

目前尚缺乏适用于重伤老年患者的可行且具有预测性的评分系统。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种用于预测重伤老年创伤患者院内死亡率的评分系统。使用了创伤登记数据库DGU(TR-DGU)。纳入了2008年至2017年间收治的欧洲老年患者(≥65岁)。相关患者变量被纳入GERtality评分。通过进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,与老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)和修订的损伤严重程度分类II(RISC-II)评分进行了比较。共纳入58,055例老年创伤患者(平均年龄:77岁)。单变量分析得出以下变量:年龄≥80岁、重症监护病房(ICU)入院前需要输注浓缩红细胞(PRBC)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≤13、任何身体部位的简明损伤量表(AIS)≥4。GERtality评分最高为5分。GERtality评分最高的患者计算出的死亡率为72.4%。GERtality评分为4分和3分的患者死亡率分别为65.1%和47.5%。新型GERtality评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.803(GTOS:0.784;RISC-II:0.879)。新型GERtality评分是一个简单可行的评分,仅使用五个特定参数就能充分预测多发伤老年患者的死亡概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/502732de543b/jcm-10-01362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/5316cf422e56/jcm-10-01362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/4cc515013956/jcm-10-01362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/83f1b2a64e12/jcm-10-01362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/502732de543b/jcm-10-01362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/5316cf422e56/jcm-10-01362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/4cc515013956/jcm-10-01362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/83f1b2a64e12/jcm-10-01362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7236/8037079/502732de543b/jcm-10-01362-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The GERtality Score: The Development of a Simple Tool to Help Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients.老年创伤患者死亡风险评分:一种用于预测老年创伤患者院内死亡率的简易工具的开发
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 25;10(7):1362. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071362.
2
[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[平民爆炸伤:一个被低估的问题?:创伤登记DGU®回顾性分析结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Oct;119(10):843-53. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0046-3.
3
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU™: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II.创伤注册登记数据库DGU™创伤风险调整模型的更新:修订后的损伤严重程度分类,第二版。
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):476. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0476-2.
5
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.
6
Predicting Mortality of Korean Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Comparison between Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score.预测韩国老年创伤患者的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分与创伤和损伤严重程度评分的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):88-94. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.88.
7
Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients.严重受伤患者修订版损伤严重程度分类评分的开发与验证
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Oct;35(5):437-47. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9122-0. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
8
The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.老年创伤的发病率正在增加,比较不同的评分工具对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct 19;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00340-1.
9
Performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients: comparison of the ISS, TRISS, and GTOS based on a systemic review and meta-analysis.创伤评分系统在预测老年创伤患者死亡率中的性能:基于系统评价和荟萃分析比较 ISS、TRISS 和 GTOS。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1453-1465. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02467-1. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Cross-validation of two prognostic trauma scores in severely injured patients.两种创伤评分系统对严重创伤患者预后评估的交叉验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01373-6. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of trauma scoring systems in geriatric patients.老年患者创伤评分系统综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42783. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042783.
2
Perioperative Management of the Geriatric Trauma Patient.老年创伤患者的围手术期管理
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2025;15. doi: 10.1007/s40140-024-00673-6. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
3
Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Severely Injured Older Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.严重创伤老年患者的短期和长期死亡率:一项回顾性分析

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of elderly mortality after trauma: A novel outcome score.创伤后老年患者死亡的预测因素:一种新的预后评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Mar;88(3):416-424. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002569.
2
Implementation of new standard operating procedures for geriatric trauma patients with multiple injuries: a single level I trauma centre study.实施新的多发伤老年创伤患者标准操作流程:一项单中心 I 级创伤中心的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1380-z.
3
Trauma laparoscopy and the six w's: Why, where, who, when, what, and how?
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062064.
4
Frailty assessment in geriatric trauma patients: comparing the predictive value of the full and a condensed version of the Fried frailty phenotype.老年创伤患者的衰弱评估:比较Fried衰弱表型完整版和精简版的预测价值。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05594-x.
5
Efficacy of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)对创伤患者死亡率的预测效能:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;14(23):2735. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232735.
6
The impact of age and intensity of treatment on the outcome of traumatic brain injury.年龄和治疗强度对创伤性脑损伤结局的影响。
Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1471209. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1471209. eCollection 2024.
7
Predictive value of qSOFA and hypothermia combined with PT for prognosis in patients with severe trauma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.qSOFA 和低温合并 PT 对严重创伤患者预后的预测价值:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 17;24(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01132-5.
8
Evaluation of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) as a Prognostic Tool in Intensive Care Unit Trauma Patients.评估老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)作为重症监护病房创伤患者的预后工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;14(19):2146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192146.
9
Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score as a Mortality Predictor in Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.老年创伤结局评分作为单纯性中度至重度创伤性脑损伤死亡率预测指标的单中心回顾性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;12(16):1680. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161680.
10
Prognosis of major trauma in patients older than 85 years admitted to the ICU, a registry-based study.入住重症监护病房的85岁以上患者重大创伤的预后:一项基于登记处的研究
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):3199-3208. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02622-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
创伤性腹腔镜检查与六个“W”:为何、何处、何人、何时、何事及如何?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):344-367. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002130.
4
Assessment of polytraumatized patients according to the Berlin Definition: Does the addition of physiological data really improve interobserver reliability?根据柏林定义评估多发伤患者:添加生理数据真的能提高观察者间可靠性吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0201818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201818. eCollection 2018.
5
Outcomes of Geriatric Trauma Patients on Preinjury Anticoagulation: A Multicenter Study.老年创伤患者伤前抗凝治疗的结局:一项多中心研究。
Am Surg. 2017 Jun 1;83(6):527-535.
6
Major influence of interobserver reliability on polytrauma identification with the Injury Severity Score (ISS): Time for a centralised coding in trauma registries?观察者间可靠性对使用损伤严重度评分(ISS)进行多发伤识别的重大影响:创伤登记中进行集中编码的时候到了吗?
Injury. 2017 Apr;48(4):885-889. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Focus on challenges and advances in the treatment of patients with penetrating injuries.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Dec;42(6):661-662. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0740-z. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients.严重受伤患者修订版损伤严重程度分类评分的开发与验证
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Oct;35(5):437-47. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9122-0. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
9
The found down patient: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.发现的俯卧位患者:一项西部创伤协会多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):976-82; discussion 982. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000862.
10
Estimating Geriatric Mortality after Injury Using Age, Injury Severity, and Performance of a Transfusion: The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.利用年龄、损伤严重程度和输血情况评估老年创伤后的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):677-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0027. Epub 2015 May 14.