Su Baihan, Bleier Benjamin, Wei Yongxiang, Wu Dawei
Department of Otolaryngology, Smell and Taste Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 18;15:646956. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.646956. eCollection 2021.
Olfactory dysfunction dramatically impairs quality of life with a prevalence of 20% in the general adult population. Psychophysical olfactory testing has been widely used to evaluate the ability to smell due to its validated utility and feasibility in clinic. This review summarizes the current literature regarding psychophysical olfactory testing and the clinical relevance of the olfactory testing with different components. Furthermore, the review highlights the diagnosis and treatment value of olfactory subtests in patients with olfactory dysfunction.
With the accumulation of studies of psychophysical olfactory testing in olfactory disorders, the clinical relevance of olfactory testing with different components is expanding. Different olfactory domains present with distinct olfactory processing and cortical activity. Psychophysical assessment of olfaction with three domains reveals different levels of olfactory processing and might assist with analyzing the pathophysiologic mechanism of the various olfactory disorders. Furthermore, olfactory thresholds provided the largest amount of non-redundant information to the olfactory diagnosis. Sinonasal olfactory dysfunction and non-sinonasal-related olfactory dysfunction are emerging classifications of smell disorders with certain characteristics of olfactory impairment and different responses to the therapy including steroids, sinus surgery, and olfactory training.
These recent advancements should promote the understanding of psychophysical olfactory testing, the association between individual subcomponents and neurophysiological processes, and pave the way for precision assessment and treatment of the olfactory dysfunction.
嗅觉功能障碍严重损害生活质量,在普通成年人群中的患病率为20%。心理物理学嗅觉测试因其在临床上的有效性和可行性,已被广泛用于评估嗅觉能力。本综述总结了有关心理物理学嗅觉测试的当前文献以及不同组成部分的嗅觉测试的临床相关性。此外,该综述强调了嗅觉子测试在嗅觉功能障碍患者中的诊断和治疗价值。
随着嗅觉障碍心理物理学嗅觉测试研究的积累,不同组成部分的嗅觉测试的临床相关性正在扩大。不同的嗅觉领域呈现出不同的嗅觉处理和皮质活动。对三个领域的嗅觉进行心理物理学评估揭示了不同水平的嗅觉处理,并可能有助于分析各种嗅觉障碍的病理生理机制。此外,嗅觉阈值为嗅觉诊断提供了最大量的非冗余信息。鼻旁窦嗅觉功能障碍和非鼻旁窦相关嗅觉功能障碍是嗅觉障碍的新兴分类,具有特定的嗅觉损害特征以及对包括类固醇、鼻窦手术和嗅觉训练在内的治疗的不同反应。
这些最新进展应促进对心理物理学嗅觉测试、各个子成分与神经生理过程之间关联的理解,并为嗅觉功能障碍的精准评估和治疗铺平道路。