Suppr超能文献

改善病情抗风湿药物联合疗法的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Liu Linfeng, Ambe Kaori, Onishi Mayu, Yoshii Yuka, Makino Toshiaki, Tohkin Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Pharmacognosy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar;18(3):e70156. doi: 10.1111/cts.70156.

Abstract

There are several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs currently available to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the optimal combination therapy with methotrexate for treating RA remains unclear. We aimed to identify combination therapies with high-efficacy and safety by employing the Bayesian method in a network meta-analysis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi web, and PMDA review reports and application materials through October 2020, and found 86 randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy outcome was the 50% improvement rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50), and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each treatment, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for each treatment to rank disease-modifying antirheumatic drug combinations. Individually, most disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs combined with methotrexate are more likely to achieve ACR50 than methotrexate monotherapy, with significant differences (p < 0.05), whereas the incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different compared with methotrexate monotherapy (p > 0.05). Infliximab combined with methotrexate had the highest efficacy ranking (OR = 10.53, 95% CrI: [3.20, 42.87], SUCRA score: 0.884), and etanercept combined with methotrexate had the highest safety ranking (OR = 0.29, 95% CrI: [0.03, 2.04], SUCRA score: 0.893). Comprehensive cluster analysis revealed that the combination of etanercept, an Fc-fusion protein targeting tumor necrosis factor α, with methotrexate demonstrated higher efficacy and safety. These findings could support the selection of combination therapies for the treatment of RA.

摘要

目前有几种改善病情抗风湿药物可用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。然而,甲氨蝶呤治疗RA的最佳联合疗法仍不明确。我们旨在通过在网络荟萃分析中采用贝叶斯方法来确定具有高效和安全性的联合疗法。我们系统检索了截至2020年10月的PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、Ichushi web以及PMDA综述报告和申请材料,共找到86项随机对照试验。主要疗效指标是根据美国风湿病学会标准(ACR50)的50%改善率,主要安全性指标是严重不良事件的发生率。我们计算了每种治疗之间的比值比(OR)及其95%可信区间(CrI),以及每种治疗的累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)分数,以对改善病情抗风湿药物组合进行排名。单独来看,大多数改善病情抗风湿药物与甲氨蝶呤联合使用比甲氨蝶呤单药治疗更有可能达到ACR50,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),而与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗相比,严重不良事件的发生率无显著差异(p > 0.05)。英夫利昔单抗与甲氨蝶呤联合使用的疗效排名最高(OR = 10.53,95% CrI:[3.20,42.87],SUCRA分数:0.884),依那西普与甲氨蝶呤联合使用的安全性排名最高(OR = 0.29,95% CrI:[0.03,2.04],SUCRA分数:0.893)。综合聚类分析显示,靶向肿瘤坏死因子α的Fc融合蛋白依那西普与甲氨蝶呤联合使用具有更高的疗效和安全性。这些发现可为RA治疗联合疗法的选择提供支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验