VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; COBRE Center for Neuromodulation and Neuroimaging, Providence, Rhode Island.
VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 1;89(11):1073-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Despite significant advances in psychiatric and psychological treatment over the last 30 years, suicide deaths have increased. Unfortunately, neuroscience insights have yielded few translational interventions that specifically target suicidal thoughts and behaviors. In our view, this is attributable to two factors. The first factor is our limited integration of neurocircuitry models with contemporary suicide theory. The second challenge is inherent to the variable nature of suicide risk over time. Few interventional neuroscience studies evaluate how temporal fluctuations in risk affect treatment, despite evidence that temporality is a key component distinguishing suicide phenotypes. To wit, individual variability in risk trajectories may provide different treatment targets to engage as a patient moves between suicidal ideation and attempt. Here, we first review contemporary ideation-to-action theories of suicide from a neurobiological perspective, focusing on valence and executive function circuits and the key role of state-induced (e.g., within stressful contexts) functional modulation on longitudinal risk trajectories. We then describe neural correlates of suicide reduction following various interventions, ranging from circuit specific (i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation) to broader pharmacological (i.e., ketamine, lithium) to psychological (i.e., brief cognitive therapy). We then introduce novel strategies for tracking risk in naturalistic settings and real time using ecological momentary interventions. We provide a critical integration of the literature focusing on the intersection between targets and temporality, and we conclude by proposing novel research designs integrating real-time and biologically based interventions to generate novel strategies for future suicide reduction research.
尽管在过去的 30 年中,精神科和心理学治疗取得了重大进展,但自杀死亡人数仍在增加。不幸的是,神经科学的研究进展很少产生专门针对自杀念头和行为的转化干预措施。在我们看来,这归因于两个因素。第一个因素是我们将神经回路模型与当代自杀理论的有限整合。第二个挑战是随着时间的推移,自杀风险的可变性所固有的。很少有干预性神经科学研究评估风险的时间波动如何影响治疗,尽管有证据表明,时间性是区分自杀表型的关键组成部分。也就是说,个体风险轨迹的可变性可能为患者从自杀意念到自杀企图的转变提供了不同的治疗目标。在这里,我们首先从神经生物学的角度回顾了当代从意念到行为的自杀理论,重点关注了价值和执行功能回路,以及状态诱导(例如,在紧张的情况下)对纵向风险轨迹的关键作用。然后,我们描述了各种干预措施后减少自杀的神经相关性,这些干预措施范围从特定回路(即经颅磁刺激)到更广泛的药理学(即氯胺酮、锂)到心理(即短暂认知疗法)。然后,我们引入了在自然环境和实时使用生态瞬时干预跟踪风险的新策略。我们对文献进行了批判性整合,重点关注目标和时间性的交叉点,并通过提出实时和基于生物学的干预措施的新研究设计,为未来减少自杀的研究提出了新的策略。