Sasseville Maxime, LeBlanc Annie, Boucher Mylène, Dugas Michèle, Mbemba Gisele, Tchuente Jack, Chouinard Maud-Christine, Beaulieu Marianne, Beaudet Nicolas, Skidmore Becky, Cholette Pascale, Aspiros Christine, Larouche Alain, Chabot Guylaine, Gagnon Marie-Pierre
Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
Nursing Faculty, Université Laval, Quebec, Québec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 5;11(4):e044437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044437.
Determine the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for individuals with a concomitant chronic disease.
We conducted a rapid review of systematic reviews. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and risk of bias evaluation. A standardised extraction form was used. Data are reported narratively.
We included systematic reviews of digital health interventions aiming to prevent, detect or manage mental health problems in individuals with a pre-existing chronic disease, including chronic mental health illnesses, published in 2010 or after.
Reports on mental health outcomes (eg, anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms).
We included 35 reviews, totalling 702 primary studies with a total sample of 50 692 participants. We structured the results in four population clusters: (1) chronic diseases, (2) cancer, (3) mental health and (4) children and youth. For populations presenting a chronic disease or cancer, health provider directed digital interventions (eg, web-based consultation, internet cognitive-behavioural therapy) are effective and safe. Further analyses are required in order to provide stronger recommendations regarding relevance for specific population (such as children and youth). Web-based interventions and email were the modes of administration that had the most reports of improvement. Virtual reality, smartphone applications and patient portal had limited reports of improvement.
Digital technologies could be used to prevent and manage mental health problems in people living with chronic conditions, with consideration for the age group and type of technology used.
确定数字心理健康干预措施对患有慢性病的个体的有效性。
我们对系统评价进行了快速回顾。两名评价者独立进行研究选择和偏倚风险评估。使用标准化的提取表格。数据以叙述形式报告。
我们纳入了2010年及以后发表的旨在预防、检测或管理患有慢性病(包括慢性精神疾病)的个体心理健康问题的数字健康干预措施的系统评价。
心理健康结局报告(如焦虑症状和抑郁症状)。
我们纳入了35项评价,共计702项原始研究,总样本量为50692名参与者。我们将结果分为四个总体类别:(1)慢性病,(2)癌症,(3)心理健康,(4)儿童和青少年。对于患有慢性病或癌症的人群,由医疗服务提供者指导的数字干预措施(如基于网络的咨询、互联网认知行为疗法)是有效且安全的。需要进一步分析,以便就与特定人群(如儿童和青少年)的相关性提供更有力的建议。基于网络的干预措施和电子邮件是报告改善情况最多的实施方式。虚拟现实、智能手机应用程序和患者门户报告的改善情况有限。
数字技术可用于预防和管理慢性病患者的心理健康问题,同时考虑年龄组和所使用技术的类型。