School of Social Work, University of British Columbia-Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Okanagan Library, University of British Columbia-Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jan;30(1):11-26. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13380. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
Considering the recent COVID-19 pandemic, we recognised a lack of synthesis amongst the available literature pertaining to the intersections of homelessness and pandemic response and planning. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to identify relevant peer-reviewed literature in this area to thematically produce evidence-based recommendations that would inform community planning and response amongst homeless populations. Although this review is inspired by the COVID-19 pandemic, our intention was to produce relevant recommendations to for all current and future outbreaks and pandemics more generally. Our search criteria focused on pandemics and rapid-spread illnesses such as contagious respiratory diseases with contact spread and with an emphasis on individuals experiencing homelessness. Content analysis methods were followed to extract and thematically synthesise key information amongst the 223 articles that matched our search criteria between the years of 1984 and 2020. Two reviewers were assigned to the screening process and used Covidence and undertook two rounds of discussion to identify and finalise themes for extraction. This review illustrates that the current breadth of academic literature on homeless populations has thus far focused on tuberculosis (TB) rather than diseases that are more recent and closely related to COVID-19-such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or H1N1. Our thematic content analysis revealed six themes that offer tangible and scalable recommendations which include (1) education and outreach, (2) adapting structure of services, (3) screening and contract tracing, (4) transmission and prevention strategies, (5) shelter protocols and (6) treatment, adherence and vaccination. The breadth and depth of reviews such as these are dependent on the quantity and quality of the available literature. Therefore, the limited existing literature outside of tuberculosis specific to homelessness in this review illustrates a need for more academic research into the intersections of pandemics and homelessness-particularly for evaluations of response and planning. Nonetheless, this review offers timely considerations for pandemic response and planning amongst homeless populations during the current COVID-19 pandemic and can facilitate future research in this area.
考虑到最近的 COVID-19 大流行,我们认识到针对无家可归者和大流行应对与规划交叉问题的现有文献缺乏综合分析。因此,本综述的目的是确定该领域相关的同行评议文献,以进行主题分析,提出循证建议,为无家可归者社区规划和应对提供信息。尽管本综述受到 COVID-19 大流行的启发,但我们的目的是为所有当前和未来的疫情,更广泛地提出相关建议。我们的搜索标准侧重于大流行和快速传播的疾病,例如具有接触传播的传染性呼吸道疾病,并强调无家可归者。采用内容分析法从 1984 年至 2020 年期间符合我们搜索标准的 223 篇文章中提取和主题综合关键信息。两名评审员负责筛选过程,并使用 Covidence 进行了两轮讨论,以确定和最终确定提取主题。本综述表明,目前关于无家可归者群体的学术文献范围主要集中在结核病 (TB) 上,而不是更近且与 COVID-19 密切相关的疾病,例如严重急性呼吸综合征 (SARS) 或 H1N1。我们的主题内容分析揭示了六个主题,提出了切实可行且可扩展的建议,包括 (1) 教育和外展,(2) 调整服务结构,(3) 筛查和接触者追踪,(4) 传播和预防策略,(5) 庇护所协议和 (6) 治疗、坚持和疫苗接种。此类综述的广度和深度取决于现有文献的数量和质量。因此,本综述中除结核病以外,针对无家可归者的现有相关文献有限,表明需要对大流行和无家可归者之间的交叉问题进行更多的学术研究,特别是对应对和规划的评估。尽管如此,本综述为当前 COVID-19 大流行期间无家可归者的大流行应对和规划提供了及时的考虑因素,并为该领域的未来研究提供了便利。