Suppr超能文献

与美国各州大麻合法化相关的社会和政治因素。

Social and Political Factors Associated With State-Level Legalization of Cannabis in the United States.

作者信息

Spetz Joanne, Chapman Susan A, Bates Timothy, Jura Matthew, Schmidt Laura A

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Healthforce Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Drug Probl. 2019 Jun 1;46(2):165-179. doi: 10.1177/0091450919827605. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

Abstract

Thirty-three U.S. states and the District of Columbia (DC) have legalized the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes and 10 states and DC have legalized marijuana for adult recreational use. This mirrors an international trend toward relaxing restrictions on marijuana. This paper analyzes patterns in marijuana laws across U.S. states to shed light on the social and political forces behind the liberalization of marijuana policy following a long era of conservatism. Data on U.S. state-level demographics, economic conditions, and cultural and political characteristics are analyzed, as well as establishment of and levels of support for other drug and social policies, to determine whether there are patterns between states that have liberalized marijuana policy versus those that have not. Laws decriminalizing marijuana possession, as well as those authorizing its sale for medical and recreational use, follow the same pattern of diffusion. The analysis points to underlying patterns of demographic, cultural, economic, and political variation linked to marijuana policy liberalization in the U.S. context, which deserve further examination internationally.

摘要

美国33个州和哥伦比亚特区已将医用大麻的使用合法化,10个州和哥伦比亚特区已将成人娱乐用大麻合法化。这反映了国际上放宽对大麻限制的趋势。本文分析了美国各州大麻法律的模式,以揭示在长期保守主义之后大麻政策自由化背后的社会和政治力量。分析了美国州一级的人口统计数据、经济状况以及文化和政治特征,以及其他毒品和社会政策的制定情况和支持程度,以确定大麻政策自由化的州与未自由化的州之间是否存在模式。将持有大麻合法化的法律,以及授权其用于医疗和娱乐用途销售的法律,遵循相同的传播模式。该分析指出了在美国背景下与大麻政策自由化相关的人口、文化、经济和政治差异的潜在模式,这在国际上值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/8022331/ab2a319e9c27/nihms-1052091-f0001.jpg

相似文献

3
Relationships Between Alcohol and Cannabis Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2019.美国各州 1999-2019 年的酒精和大麻政策关系。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Mar;85(2):254-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00035. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Cannabis Policy in the United States: Implications for Public Health.美国的大麻政策:对公共卫生的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):39-52. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab016.
9
Marijuana liberalization policies and perinatal health.大麻合法化政策与围产期健康。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102537. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Physicians' Case for Marijuana Legalization.医生支持大麻合法化的理由。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Nov;107(11):1746-1747. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304052.
2
4
European observations on cannabis legalization.
Addiction. 2017 Jul;112(7):1136-1137. doi: 10.1111/add.13740. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
Adverse effects of marijuana use.使用大麻的不良反应。
Linacre Q. 2016 May;83(2):174-178. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2016.1175707.
8
Economic insights on market structure and competition.关于市场结构与竞争的经济见解。
Addiction. 2016 Dec;111(12):2094-2095. doi: 10.1111/add.13458. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验