Spetz Joanne, Chapman Susan A, Bates Timothy, Jura Matthew, Schmidt Laura A
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Healthforce Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Contemp Drug Probl. 2019 Jun 1;46(2):165-179. doi: 10.1177/0091450919827605. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Thirty-three U.S. states and the District of Columbia (DC) have legalized the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes and 10 states and DC have legalized marijuana for adult recreational use. This mirrors an international trend toward relaxing restrictions on marijuana. This paper analyzes patterns in marijuana laws across U.S. states to shed light on the social and political forces behind the liberalization of marijuana policy following a long era of conservatism. Data on U.S. state-level demographics, economic conditions, and cultural and political characteristics are analyzed, as well as establishment of and levels of support for other drug and social policies, to determine whether there are patterns between states that have liberalized marijuana policy versus those that have not. Laws decriminalizing marijuana possession, as well as those authorizing its sale for medical and recreational use, follow the same pattern of diffusion. The analysis points to underlying patterns of demographic, cultural, economic, and political variation linked to marijuana policy liberalization in the U.S. context, which deserve further examination internationally.
美国33个州和哥伦比亚特区已将医用大麻的使用合法化,10个州和哥伦比亚特区已将成人娱乐用大麻合法化。这反映了国际上放宽对大麻限制的趋势。本文分析了美国各州大麻法律的模式,以揭示在长期保守主义之后大麻政策自由化背后的社会和政治力量。分析了美国州一级的人口统计数据、经济状况以及文化和政治特征,以及其他毒品和社会政策的制定情况和支持程度,以确定大麻政策自由化的州与未自由化的州之间是否存在模式。将持有大麻合法化的法律,以及授权其用于医疗和娱乐用途销售的法律,遵循相同的传播模式。该分析指出了在美国背景下与大麻政策自由化相关的人口、文化、经济和政治差异的潜在模式,这在国际上值得进一步研究。