• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典成年人人工耳蜗植入的成本效益

The cost-effectiveness of Cochlear implants in Swedish adults.

作者信息

Gumbie Mutsa, Olin Emma, Parkinson Bonny, Bowman Ross, Cutler Henry

机构信息

Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06271-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06271-0
PMID:33832467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8034197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research has shown unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) significantly improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in adults. However, only 13% of eligible Swedish adults currently use a unilateral CI. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of unilateral CIs compared to a hearing aid for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss.

METHODS

A Markov model with a lifetime horizon and six-month cycle length was developed to estimate the benefits and costs of unilateral CIs from the Swedish health system perspective. A treatment pathway was developed through consultation with clinical experts to estimate resource use and costs. Unit costs were derived from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Health outcomes were reported in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Unilateral CIs for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss are likely to be deemed cost-effective when compared to a hearing aid (SEK 140,474 per QALY gained). The results were most sensitive to the age when patients are implanted with a CI and the proportion of patients eligible for CIs after triage.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the prevalence of Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss is expected as the population ages. Earlier implantation of unilateral CIs improves the cost-effectiveness among people eligible for CIs. Unilateral CIs are an efficacious and cost-effective option to improve hearing and quality of life in Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss.

摘要

背景

研究表明,单侧人工耳蜗植入(CI)可显著改善成人的临床疗效和生活质量。然而,目前在符合条件的瑞典成年人中,只有13%使用单侧人工耳蜗。目的是评估与助听器相比,单侧人工耳蜗对瑞典重度至极重度听力损失成年人的成本效益。

方法

建立了一个具有终身时间范围和六个月周期长度的马尔可夫模型,从瑞典卫生系统的角度估计单侧人工耳蜗的益处和成本。通过与临床专家协商制定了治疗路径,以估计资源使用和成本。单位成本来自瑞典国家卫生和福利委员会以及瑞典地方当局和地区协会。健康结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)报告。

结果

与助听器相比,瑞典重度至极重度听力损失的成年人使用单侧人工耳蜗可能被认为具有成本效益(每获得一个QALY为140,474瑞典克朗)。结果对患者接受人工耳蜗植入的年龄以及分诊后符合人工耳蜗植入条件的患者比例最为敏感。

结论

随着人口老龄化,预计瑞典重度至极重度听力损失的成年人患病率会增加。尽早植入单侧人工耳蜗可提高符合人工耳蜗植入条件人群的成本效益。单侧人工耳蜗是改善瑞典重度至极重度听力损失成年人听力和生活质量的一种有效且具有成本效益的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/fe141efc2320/12913_2021_6271_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/991f2dac7f15/12913_2021_6271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/719c33294938/12913_2021_6271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/1fcc56180016/12913_2021_6271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/62f25fde43ad/12913_2021_6271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/9a8332f4d268/12913_2021_6271_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/6ac0bb80bb25/12913_2021_6271_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/fe141efc2320/12913_2021_6271_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/991f2dac7f15/12913_2021_6271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/719c33294938/12913_2021_6271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/1fcc56180016/12913_2021_6271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/62f25fde43ad/12913_2021_6271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/9a8332f4d268/12913_2021_6271_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/6ac0bb80bb25/12913_2021_6271_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/8034197/fe141efc2320/12913_2021_6271_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of Cochlear implants in Swedish adults.瑞典成年人人工耳蜗植入的成本效益
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06271-0.
2
The Cost-Effectiveness of Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Adults with Bilateral Severe to Profound Deafness.双耳重度至极重度感音神经性聋成人中,双侧与单侧及双侧人工耳蜗植入的成本-效果比较。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1425-1436. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000727.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.人工耳蜗植入术治疗儿童和成人重度至极重度耳聋的效果和成本效益:系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(44):1-330. doi: 10.3310/hta13440.
4
The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implants in UK adults.英国成年人单侧人工耳蜗植入的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Jul;23(5):763-779. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01393-y. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment.双侧人工耳蜗植入:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018 Oct 24;18(6):1-139. eCollection 2018.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bilateral cochlear implants for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears in Singapore.新加坡双耳重度至极重度感音神经性聋儿童双侧人工耳蜗植入的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0220439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220439. eCollection 2019.
7
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.用于单侧耳聋及传导性或混合性听力损失的植入式设备:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020.
8
Cost-Utility Analysis of Cochlear Implantation in Australian Adults.澳大利亚成年人人工耳蜗植入的成本效益分析。
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):454-61. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000999.
9
Economic Analysis of Cochlear Implants in Adults With Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. A Systematic Review of the Literature.双侧重度至极重度听力损失成人植入人工耳蜗的经济学分析。文献系统评价。
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Aug 1;45(7):717-731. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004225. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation in Rural China.中国农村地区儿童人工耳蜗植入的成本效益分析
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):e75-e84. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001389.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implant Sound Processor Upgrades in Older Adults: Outcomes from a Large Australian Multicenter Study.评估老年人人工耳蜗声音处理器升级的临床效果和成本效益:一项大型澳大利亚多中心研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 May 28;14(11):3765. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113765.
2
The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation in the Finnish health care.芬兰医疗保健中单侧人工耳蜗植入的成本效益。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09468-9.
3
Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults.

本文引用的文献

1
The Outcome of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: Speech Recognition, Health-Related Quality of Life and Level of Anxiety and Depression: a One- and Three-Year Follow-Up Study.成人单侧人工耳蜗植入的结果:言语识别、健康相关生活质量以及焦虑和抑郁水平:一项一年和三年的随访研究。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;24(3):e338-346. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399540. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard.英国和佛兰德地区人工耳蜗植入的选择标准:迈向限制更少的标准。
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):68-75. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901.
3
人工耳蜗植入手术。意大利耳鼻喉科学会(SIOeChCF)和意大利听力学与语音治疗学会(SIAF)的意大利临床实践指南。第1部分:成人人工耳蜗植入
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 Feb;45(1):47-57. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N3081.
4
Cochlear implant cost analysis in adults: a European narrative review.成人人工耳蜗植入成本分析:欧洲叙述性综述。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4455-4471. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08591-3. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
5
Using Anatomy-Based Fitting to Reduce Frequency-to-Place Mismatch in Experienced Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: A Promising Concept.运用基于解剖学的适配来减少经验丰富的双侧人工耳蜗使用者中频率与位置的不匹配:一个有前景的概念。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 8;13(7):1109. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071109.
6
Impact of hearing impairment and cochlear implantation on productivity and social well-being in a professionally active but severely hearing-impaired group: protocol of the 'Hear again, work again' longitudinal prospective cohort study.职业活跃但重度听力受损人群中听力障碍及人工耳蜗植入对生产力和社会福祉的影响:“再次听见,再次工作”纵向前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 8;13(3):e064514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064514.
7
Do Not Go Gentle into That Deaf Night: A Holistic Perspective on Cochlear Implant Use as Part of Healthy Aging.不要温和地走进那个良夜:关于将人工耳蜗作为健康老龄化一部分使用的整体视角。
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 5;12(10):1658. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101658.
8
Cost-effectiveness of comprehensive preventive measures for coal workers' pneumoconiosis in China.中国煤工尘肺综合预防措施的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07654-7.
Barriers and Facilitators to Cochlear Implant Uptake in Australia and the United Kingdom.
澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入普及的障碍与促进因素
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):374-385. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000762.
4
Rehabilitation of adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairment - why not cochlear implants?重度至极重度听力障碍成年患者的康复——为何不选择人工耳蜗?
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;139(7):604-611. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1607976. Epub 2019 May 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Receiving Intensive Insulin Treatment in Sweden.瑞典1型糖尿病强化胰岛素治疗患者使用动态血糖监测系统的成本效益分析
Eur Endocrinol. 2018 Sep;14(2):73-79. doi: 10.17925/EE.2018.14.2.73. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Qualitative, multimethod study of behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation from the patient and healthcare professional perspective in Australia and the UK: study protocol.从患者和医疗保健专业人员角度对澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入行为和态度反应的定性多方法研究:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 29;8(5):e019623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019623.
7
Health Economic Data Requirements and Availability in the European Union: Results of a Survey Among 10 European Countries.欧盟的卫生经济数据要求与可得性:对10个欧洲国家的调查结果
Value Health Reg Issues. 2014 Sep;4:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
8
Patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation treated with a percutaneous osseointegrated prosthesis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.经皮骨整合假体治疗单侧股部截肢患者的成本效益分析。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):527-534. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0968.R1.
9
Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative Review.人工耳蜗的生活质量与成本效益:一项叙述性综述
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):236-258. doi: 10.1159/000481767. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.采用一般健康相关患者报告结局指标评估人工耳蜗植入效果的Meta分析。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jan;39(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001620.