Suppr超能文献

英国和佛兰德地区人工耳蜗植入的选择标准:迈向限制更少的标准。

Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard.

作者信息

van der Straaten Tirza F K, Briaire Jeroen J, Vickers Deborah, Boermans Peter Paul B M, Frijns Johan H M

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):68-75. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders.

DESIGN

The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding.

RESULTS

The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding.

CONCLUSIONS

The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation.

摘要

目的

在荷兰一家三级转诊中心的患者群体中,研究英国和佛兰德(比利时讲荷兰语的地区)新引入的人工耳蜗植入标准的影响。我们比较了根据新旧标准纳入/排除的患者在我们中心植入后言语理解实际改善情况。我们还进行了敏感性分析,以检验英国和佛兰德使用的不同术前评估方法的有效性。

设计

选择标准基于0.5、1、2和4千赫的术前纯音听力测定以及佩戴和不佩戴最佳辅助助听器时的言语感知测试(SPT)。术后,进行相同的SPT以评估言语理解方面的获益。

结果

佛兰德和英国新引入的标准限制较少,导致人工耳蜗植入患者的百分比更高(增加了30%),敏感性提高了31%。两国使用的术前最佳辅助SPT在指示术后言语理解改善方面具有最高的诊断能力。我们观察到,在这两个国家,患者选择以前主要由纯音听力测定标准主导,而在新标准中言语理解变得更加重要。在被新标准排除的患者中,八分之七(英国和佛兰德)确实表现出术后言语理解有所改善。

结论

英国和佛兰德的新选择标准使更多语后聋成年人受益于人工耳蜗植入。新的英国和佛兰德标准依赖于具有最高诊断能力的最佳辅助SPT。值得注意的是,新标准仍然导致一些预计植入后言语理解会有显著提高的候选人被拒绝。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5f/7757743/9c9dab749b7a/aud-42-068-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验