Thomas Elizabeth C, Bass Sarah Bauerle, Siminoff Laura A
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113900. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113900. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
The contemporary healthcare field operates according to an autonomy model of medical decision-making. This model stipulates that patients have the right to make informed choices about their care. Shared decision making (SDM) has arisen as the dominant approach for clinicians and patients to collaborate in care planning and implementation. This approach relies heavily on normative (rational) decision-making processes, and often leaves out descriptive influences that stem from personal, social, and environmental factors and explain how decisions are typically made in the real world. The lack of attention to descriptive decision-making limits SDM in many ways. A multi-level approach to expanding the practice of SDM is proposed, including tailoring the decision encounter based on patients' social, cultural, and environmental context; using relational elements strategically as part of the SDM process; and modifying incentive models to promote greater attention to descriptive impacts on decision-making. These modifications are expected to make SDM, and thus patient care, more inclusive, effective, and acceptable to diverse patients.
当代医疗保健领域按照医疗决策的自主模式运作。该模式规定,患者有权对自己的治疗做出明智的选择。共同决策(SDM)已成为临床医生和患者在护理计划和实施中进行协作的主要方法。这种方法严重依赖规范(理性)决策过程,并且常常忽略源于个人、社会和环境因素的描述性影响,而这些影响可以解释现实世界中决策通常是如何做出的。对描述性决策缺乏关注在许多方面限制了共同决策。本文提出了一种多层次的方法来扩展共同决策的实践,包括根据患者的社会、文化和环境背景调整决策过程;将关系要素策略性地用作共同决策过程的一部分;以及修改激励模式,以促进对决策的描述性影响给予更多关注。预计这些改进将使共同决策以及患者护理对不同患者更具包容性、有效性和可接受性。