Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota.
Communication, Culture, and Technology Program, Georgetown University.
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(13):1622-1630. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1910165. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Given concerns about the persuasive power of video misinformation on social media for health topics, we test two techniques - exposure to a news literacy video and user corrections - to limit the effects on misperceptions. An online sample of American adults from August of 2019 was randomly assigned to view two simulated Facebook videos. The first video manipulated the presence of news literacy concepts. The second video either promoted sunscreen use or made inaccurate claims regarding its dangers; scrolling comments either debunked or did not address the sunscreen misinformation in the video. Our results demonstrate that video misinformation heightened beliefs in sunscreen myths and reduced acceptance of sunscreen facts and intentions to wear sunscreen compared to a promotional video. Real-time user corrections were partially successful in reducing the effects of the misinformation video on beliefs but not intentions. Additionally, exposure to a news literacy video did not inoculate people to the misinformation. We discuss the implications of these findings for best practices regarding correcting video misinformation on health topics.
鉴于社交媒体上有关健康主题的视频错误信息的说服力令人担忧,我们测试了两种技术 - 接触新闻素养视频和用户纠正 - 以限制错误认知的影响。2019 年 8 月,一项针对美国成年人的在线样本被随机分配观看两个模拟 Facebook 视频。第一个视频操纵了新闻素养概念的存在。第二个视频要么宣传防晒霜的使用,要么对其危险做出不准确的声称;滚动评论要么揭穿,要么不解决视频中防晒霜的错误信息。我们的结果表明,与宣传视频相比,视频错误信息增加了对防晒霜神话的信仰,降低了对防晒霜事实的接受程度以及涂抹防晒霜的意愿。实时用户纠正部分成功地减少了错误信息视频对信仰的影响,但对意图没有影响。此外,接触新闻素养视频并不能使人们免受错误信息的影响。我们讨论了这些发现对纠正健康主题视频错误信息的最佳实践的影响。