Suppr超能文献

野猪中的非洲猪瘟:评估韩国的干预措施。

African Swine Fever in wild boar: Assessing interventions in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Biology Education, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.

SaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha & CSIC, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Sep;68(5):2878-2889. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14106. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

African Swine Fever (ASF) was detected in South Korean pig farms in September 2019. Currently, ASF occurs mostly in wild boar (Sus scrofa). We describe the ASF dynamics in wild boar in South Korea from October 2019 to October 2020 and use case studies to evidence the advantages and limitations of the control measures applied. During 2019, ASF remained confined in fenced areas of three counties. Since January 2020 however, the ASF management policy changed from fencing with limited disturbance to culling (with more disturbance), and ASF spread east and south. Until 31 October 2020, a total of 775 wild boar ASF cases have been confirmed, affecting 9 counties. Interventions for ASF control in wild boar included silent (trapping) and non-silent (shooting) population control, local and large-scale fencing, and carcass destruction. Pre-ASF wild boar densities were closed to 10 per km . Biosafety risks arose from the movements of people and vehicles, swill feeding of wild boar, destroying pig herds, handling wild boar during trapping and hunting, and searching for and disposing of carcasses. Despite training efforts, biosafety regulations were sometimes ignored. We observed differences between counties regarding disease control. While interventions apparently succeeded in controlling ASF in one site where geographical features and fast decision making facilitated an early and efficient fencing, and culling was performed silently, biosafety problems and habitat- and management-related delays hindered ASF control in other situations. Given that carcass, destruction faces specific limitations in South Korea, fencing and trapping (under appropriate biosafety conditions) might represent the most effective intervention option.

摘要

非洲猪瘟 (ASF) 于 2019 年 9 月在韩国的养猪场被检测到。目前,ASF 主要发生在野猪 (Sus scrofa) 中。我们描述了 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 10 月韩国野猪 ASF 的动态,并通过案例研究证明了所采用的控制措施的优势和局限性。2019 年期间,ASF 仍局限于三个县的围栏区域内。然而,自 2020 年 1 月以来,ASF 的管理政策已从有限干扰的围栏转变为(更多干扰的)扑杀,ASF 向东和向南传播。截至 2020 年 10 月 31 日,共确认 775 例野猪 ASF 病例,涉及 9 个县。针对野猪 ASF 的控制干预措施包括无声(诱捕)和非无声(射击)种群控制、局部和大规模围栏以及尸体销毁。ASF 前野猪密度接近每平方公里 10 头。人员和车辆的移动、野猪泔水喂养、破坏猪群、在诱捕和狩猎期间处理野猪以及搜索和处理尸体等带来了生物安全风险。尽管进行了培训,但有时仍会忽略生物安全法规。我们观察到各县在疾病控制方面存在差异。虽然干预措施显然在一个地方成功地控制了 ASF,在该地方,地理特征和快速决策有助于早期和有效的围栏以及无声扑杀,但生物安全问题以及与栖息地和管理相关的延迟阻碍了其他情况下 ASF 的控制。鉴于在韩国,尸体销毁面临具体的限制,围栏和诱捕(在适当的生物安全条件下)可能代表最有效的干预选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验