• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017.2017年按州政策环境划分的诊所堕胎服务提供情况。
Contracept X. 2020;2:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Differences in Abortion Service Delivery in Hostile, Middle-ground, and Supportive States in 2014.2014 年敌对、中间立场和支持堕胎州的堕胎服务提供情况的差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Factors hindering access to abortion services.阻碍获得堕胎服务的因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):54-9, 87.
4
Freestanding abortion clinics: services, structure, fees.独立堕胎诊所:服务、结构、费用。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1982 Sep-Oct;14(5):248-50, 253-6.
5
Providing controversial health care: abortion services since 1973.提供有争议的医疗保健服务:自1973年以来的堕胎服务。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):152-7. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80249-x.
6
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.南亚的堕胎服务提供情况:四个国家的比较研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29.
7
Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988.1987年和1988年美国的堕胎服务情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 May-Jun;22(3):102-8, 142.
8
Abortion travel within the United States: An observational study of cross-state movement to obtain abortion care in 2017.美国境内的堕胎就医之旅:2017年跨州寻求堕胎护理的观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Mar 4;10:100214. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100214. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Abortion services in the United States, 1984 and 1985.1984年和1985年美国的堕胎服务情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):63-70.
10
In the states.在美国。
Reprod Freedom News. 1994 Feb 25;3(4):5-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
Patient experiences using public and private insurance coverage for abortion in Illinois: Implementation successes and remaining gaps.伊利诺伊州患者使用公共和私人保险覆盖堕胎的经历:实施成功和遗留差距。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):269-281. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12259. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
3
Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking.寻求堕胎时导致延误的障碍经历及心理健康状况。
Contracept X. 2024 Mar 6;6:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100105. eCollection 2024.
4
Health services provided at the time of abortion in the US: a scoping review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence.美国堕胎时提供的医疗服务:定性和定量证据的范围综述
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 23:2024.01.22.24301627. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.22.24301627.
5
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.得克萨斯州 2021 年堕胎禁令后,堕胎患者关于在哪里获得州外护理的决策。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Association Between Rates of Down Syndrome Diagnosis in States With vs Without 20-Week Abortion Bans From 2011 to 2018.2011 年至 2018 年期间,有与没有 20 周堕胎禁令的州之间唐氏综合征诊断率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3684.
7
Association of Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy With the Number of Facility-Based Abortions in Texas and Surrounding States.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎与德克萨斯州及周边州医疗机构堕胎数量的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2048-2055. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20423.
8
The economic context of pursuing online medication abortion in the United States.在美国寻求在线药物流产的经济背景。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2021 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100003. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit.美国堕胎寻求者在 Reddit 上讨论的与成本相关的障碍及其后果:按支付方限制对生殖保健的实时影响:定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):9013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179013.
10
The future of abortion is now: Mifepristone by mail and in-clinic abortion access in the United States.流产的未来:米非司酮通过邮件和美国诊所内的堕胎服务。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Care Churn - Why Keeping Clinic Doors Open Isn't Enough to Ensure Access to Abortion.医疗服务反复无常——为何仅维持诊所运营不足以确保堕胎服务可及
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):508-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2013466.
2
Transgender abortion patients and the provision of transgender-specific care at non-hospital facilities that provide abortions.跨性别堕胎患者以及在提供堕胎服务的非医院机构中提供针对跨性别者的护理。
Contracept X. 2020 Jan 18;2:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100019. eCollection 2020.
3
COVID-19 Abortion Bans and Their Implications for Public Health.新冠疫情期间的堕胎禁令及其对公共卫生的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):65-68. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12139. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.评论:非检测药物流产:大流行期间及之后增加可及性的示例方案。
Contraception. 2020 Jun;101(6):361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
Challenges and strategies for contraceptive care in independent abortion clinics in the United States, 2017.美国独立堕胎诊所避孕护理的挑战与策略,2017 年。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Oct;21:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.罗诉韦德案被推翻后堕胎可及性和发生率的预测变化。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Differences in Abortion Service Delivery in Hostile, Middle-ground, and Supportive States in 2014.2014 年敌对、中间立场和支持堕胎州的堕胎服务提供情况的差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.《限制堕胎法案》与美国堕胎提供者的无形劳动
Crit Public Health. 2016;26(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

2017年按州政策环境划分的诊所堕胎服务提供情况。

Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017.

作者信息

Witwer Elizabeth, Jones Rachel K, Fuentes Liza, Castle S Kate

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10038.

出版信息

Contracept X. 2020;2:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043
PMID:33083783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561526/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions and types of nonabortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle ground or supportive of abortion rights.

RESULTS

In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care 5 or more days per week compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered standalone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查2017年提供堕胎服务的诊所的服务提供情况,包括堕胎政策环境的差异。

研究设计

利用古特马赫研究所2017年堕胎服务提供者普查数据,我们调查了堕胎护理收费、提供堕胎服务时的妊娠周数、诊所每周提供堕胎服务的天数以及所提供的非堕胎服务类型。我们的分析重点是当年提供了95%堕胎服务的808家诊所设施。相关指标在全国范围内进行了计算,并根据诊所所在州被我们归类为对堕胎权利持敌对、中立或支持态度来进行计算。

结果

2017年,64%的诊所妊娠11周时提供堕胎服务,22%的诊所在妊娠20周时提供。与敌对州相比,支持堕胎权利的州在每个测量妊娠阶段提供堕胎服务的诊所密度更高。妊娠10周时,诊所进行手术堕胎的平均收费为549美元,药物堕胎为551美元。支持堕胎权利州约46%的诊所每周提供堕胎护理5天或更多天,而敌对州为29%。大多数诊所提供独立的避孕和计划生育服务(87%)以及妇科护理(85%),但提供这些服务的诊所比例在支持堕胎权利的州(93%和90%)高于敌对州(75%和73%)。

结论

相当一部分堕胎设施提供一系列其他医疗保健服务。服务提供的某些方面,如提供堕胎服务的天数,可能因堕胎政策环境而异。

启示声明

对堕胎权利持敌对态度的州实施的严苛政策可能会抑制一些设施每周提供更多天数的堕胎服务,如果是这样,可能会给这些州寻求堕胎护理的患者带来更大负担。