Suppr超能文献

2017年按州政策环境划分的诊所堕胎服务提供情况。

Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017.

作者信息

Witwer Elizabeth, Jones Rachel K, Fuentes Liza, Castle S Kate

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10038.

出版信息

Contracept X. 2020;2:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions and types of nonabortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle ground or supportive of abortion rights.

RESULTS

In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care 5 or more days per week compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered standalone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查2017年提供堕胎服务的诊所的服务提供情况,包括堕胎政策环境的差异。

研究设计

利用古特马赫研究所2017年堕胎服务提供者普查数据,我们调查了堕胎护理收费、提供堕胎服务时的妊娠周数、诊所每周提供堕胎服务的天数以及所提供的非堕胎服务类型。我们的分析重点是当年提供了95%堕胎服务的808家诊所设施。相关指标在全国范围内进行了计算,并根据诊所所在州被我们归类为对堕胎权利持敌对、中立或支持态度来进行计算。

结果

2017年,64%的诊所妊娠11周时提供堕胎服务,22%的诊所在妊娠20周时提供。与敌对州相比,支持堕胎权利的州在每个测量妊娠阶段提供堕胎服务的诊所密度更高。妊娠10周时,诊所进行手术堕胎的平均收费为549美元,药物堕胎为551美元。支持堕胎权利州约46%的诊所每周提供堕胎护理5天或更多天,而敌对州为29%。大多数诊所提供独立的避孕和计划生育服务(87%)以及妇科护理(85%),但提供这些服务的诊所比例在支持堕胎权利的州(93%和90%)高于敌对州(75%和73%)。

结论

相当一部分堕胎设施提供一系列其他医疗保健服务。服务提供的某些方面,如提供堕胎服务的天数,可能因堕胎政策环境而异。

启示声明

对堕胎权利持敌对态度的州实施的严苛政策可能会抑制一些设施每周提供更多天数的堕胎服务,如果是这样,可能会给这些州寻求堕胎护理的患者带来更大负担。

相似文献

6
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.南亚的堕胎服务提供情况:四个国家的比较研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
In the states.在美国。
Reprod Freedom News. 1994 Feb 25;3(4):5-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

3
COVID-19 Abortion Bans and Their Implications for Public Health.新冠疫情期间的堕胎禁令及其对公共卫生的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):65-68. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12139. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.罗诉韦德案被推翻后堕胎可及性和发生率的预测变化。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.《限制堕胎法案》与美国堕胎提供者的无形劳动
Crit Public Health. 2016;26(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验