Suppr超能文献

中国城乡患者就医体验差异:一项基于居民视角的精确匹配研究

Rural and urban differences in patient experience in China: a coarsened exact matching study from the perspective of residents.

作者信息

Zhao Dantong, Zhou Zhongliang, Shen Chi, Nawaz Rashed, Li Dan, Ren Yangling, Zhao Yaxin, Cao Dan, Zhai Xiaohui

机构信息

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06328-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience is a key measure widely used to evaluate quality of healthcare, yet there is little discussion about it in China using national survey data. This study aimed to explore rural and urban differences in patient experience in China.

METHODS

Data regarding this study were drawn from Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) 2015, with a sample size of 9604. Patient experience was measured by the evaluation on healthcare services. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) method was used to balance covariates between the rural and urban respondents. Three thousand three hundred seventy-two participants finally comprised the matched cohort, including 1592 rural residents and 1780 urban residents. Rural and urban differences in patient experience were tested by ordinary least-squares regression and ordered logistic regression.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) score of patient experience for rural and urban residents was 72.35(17.32) and 69.45(17.00), respectively. Urban residents reported worse patient experience than rural counterparts (Crude analysis: Coef. = - 2.897, 95%CI: - 4.434, - 1.361; OR = 0.706, 95%CI: 0.595, 0.838; Multivariate analysis: Coef. = - 3.040, 95%CI: - 4.473, - 1.607; OR = 0.675, 95%CI: 0.569, 0.801). Older (Coef. = 2.029, 95%CI: 0.338, 3.719) and healthier (Coef. = 2.287, 95%CI: 0.729, 3.845; OR = 1.217, 95%CI: 1.008, 1.469) rural residents living in western area (Coef. = 2.098, 95%CI: 0.464, 3.732; OR = 1.276, 95%CI: 1.044, 1.560) with higher social status (Coef. = 1.158, 95%CI: 0.756, 1.561; OR = 1.145, 95%CI: 1.090, 1.204), evaluation on adequacy (Coef. = 7.018, 95%CI: 5.045, 8.992; OR = 2.163, 95%CI: 1.719, 2.721), distribution (Coef. = 4.464, 95%CI: 2.471, 6.456; OR = 1.658, 95%CI: 1.312, 2.096) and accessibility (Coef. = 2.995, 95%CI: 0.963, 5.026; OR = 1.525, 95%CI: 1.217, 1.911) of healthcare resources had better patient experience. In addition, urban peers with lower education (OR = 0.763, 95%CI: 0.625, 0.931) and higher family economic status (Coef. = 2.990, 95%CI: 0.959, 5.021; OR = 1.371, 95%CI: 1.090,1.723) reported better patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in patient experience for rural and urban residents were observed in this study. It is necessary to not only encourage residents to form a habit of seeking healthcare services in local primary healthcare institutions first and then go to large hospitals in urban areas when necessary, but also endeavor to reduce the disparity of healthcare resources between rural and urban areas by improving quality and capacity of rural healthcare institutions and primary healthcare system of China.

摘要

背景

患者体验是广泛用于评估医疗质量的一项关键指标,但在中国,利用全国性调查数据对此进行的讨论较少。本研究旨在探讨中国城乡居民在患者体验方面的差异。

方法

本研究数据取自2015年中国综合社会调查(CGSS),样本量为9604。通过对医疗服务的评价来衡量患者体验。采用精确匹配法(CEM)平衡城乡受访者之间的协变量。最终,3372名参与者组成了匹配队列,其中包括1592名农村居民和1780名城市居民。通过普通最小二乘法回归和有序逻辑回归检验城乡居民在患者体验方面的差异。

结果

农村和城市居民患者体验的平均(标准差)得分分别为72.35(17.32)和69.45(17.00)。城市居民的患者体验比农村居民差(粗分析:系数=-2.897,95%置信区间:-4.434,-1.361;比值比=0.706,95%置信区间:0.595,0.838;多变量分析:系数=-3.040,95%置信区间:-4.473,-1.607;比值比=0.675,95%置信区间:0.569,0.801)。年龄较大(系数=2.029,95%置信区间:0.338,3.719)、健康状况较好(系数=2.287,95%置信区间:0.729,3.845;比值比=1.217,95%置信区间:1.008,1.469)、居住在西部地区(系数=2.098,95%置信区间:0.464,3.732;比值比=1.276,95%置信区间:1.044,1.560)且社会地位较高(系数=1.158,95%置信区间:0.756,1.561;比值比=1.145,95%置信区间:1.090,1.204)的农村居民,对医疗资源充足性(系数=7.018,95%置信区间:5.045,8.992;比值比=2.163,95%置信区间:1.719,2.721)、分配(系数=4.464,95%置信区间:2.471,6.456;比值比=1.658,95%置信区间:1.312,2.096)和可及性(系数=2.995,95%置信区间:0.963,5.026;比值比=1.525,95%置信区间:1.217,1.911)的评价较高,患者体验更好。此外,教育程度较低(比值比=0.763,95%置信区间:0.625,0.931)且家庭经济状况较好(系数=2.990,95%置信区间:0.959,5.021;比值比=1.371,95%置信区间:1.090,1.723)的城市居民患者体验更好。

结论

本研究观察到城乡居民在患者体验方面存在差异。不仅有必要鼓励居民养成先在当地基层医疗机构寻求医疗服务、必要时再前往城市大医院的习惯,还应努力通过提高中国农村医疗机构的质量和能力以及基层医疗体系,来缩小城乡医疗资源差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6393/8042990/1fa2d98b3085/12913_2021_6328_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验