Rollason T P, Byrne P, Williams A, Brown G
Department of Pathology, University of Birmingham.
J Clin Pathol. 1988 May;41(5):547-52. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.5.547.
The staining patterns obtained with antiepithelial membrane antigen (anti-EMA) and the monoclonal antibody to 3-fucosyl-N-acetyllactosamine (AGF 4:48) in the uterine cervix in intraepithelial and invasive neoplasia were compared to determine a possible role in differential diagnosis of reactive and neoplastic conditions. Both early invasive and in situ adenocarcinoma stained equally intensely with both agents and both antibodies stained diffusely tubal metaplasia, endometrial lined glands, and even occasional areas of normal endocervical mucosa. It is concluded that these agents are unlikely to be of use in the routine histological differentiation of glandular and squamous cervical dysplasia or neoplasia, but immunostaining with anti-EMA may help differentiate between reactive and metaplastic changes in endocervical glands and adenocarcinoma in situ.
比较抗上皮膜抗原(抗EMA)和抗3-岩藻糖基-N-乙酰乳糖胺单克隆抗体(AGF 4:48)在子宫颈上皮内瘤变和浸润性肿瘤中的染色模式,以确定其在反应性和肿瘤性病变鉴别诊断中的可能作用。早期浸润性腺癌和原位腺癌用这两种试剂染色强度相同,两种抗体均弥漫性地染色输卵管化生、子宫内膜内衬腺体,甚至偶尔的正常宫颈内膜黏膜区域。得出的结论是,这些试剂不太可能用于宫颈腺体和鳞状上皮发育异常或肿瘤的常规组织学鉴别,但抗EMA免疫染色可能有助于区分宫颈内膜腺体的反应性和化生改变以及原位腺癌。