Heyderman E, Strudley I, Powell G, Richardson T C, Cordell J L, Mason D Y
Br J Cancer. 1985 Sep;52(3):355-61. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1985.201.
Two polyclonal rabbit antibodies to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), two mouse monoclonal antibodies (E29 and HMFG-2), and a "cocktail" of these two monoclonals have been compared using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique. Sections from 25 tissues (17 malignant and 8 benign), were examined. The distribution of staining with each of these reagents was similar, but the polyclonal antibodies produced stronger staining in colorectal carcinomas and lactating breast, whereas staining with the monoclonal antibodies was stronger in non-neoplastic pleural mesothelium and in pulmonary alveolar cells. When the two monoclonals were mixed there was no increase in staining intensity. E29 gave a "cleaner" result than HMFG-2, with better discrimination between cells and stroma, and is highly suitable for routine diagnostic histopathology.
使用间接免疫过氧化物酶技术比较了两种针对上皮膜抗原(EMA)的兔多克隆抗体、两种小鼠单克隆抗体(E29和HMFG-2)以及这两种单克隆抗体的“混合物”。检查了来自25种组织(17种恶性和8种良性)的切片。这些试剂中每种的染色分布相似,但多克隆抗体在结肠直肠癌和哺乳期乳腺中产生更强的染色,而单克隆抗体在非肿瘤性胸膜间皮和肺泡细胞中的染色更强。当两种单克隆抗体混合时,染色强度没有增加。与HMFG-2相比,E29产生的结果“更清晰”,细胞与基质之间的区分更好,非常适合常规诊断组织病理学。