Suppr超能文献

干扰素治疗在重症 COVID-19 中的作用:COVIFERON 随机对照试验。

Role of interferon therapy in severe COVID-19: the COVIFERON randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 13;11(1):8059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86859-y.

Abstract

Type 1 Interferons (IFNs) have been associated with positive effects on Coronaviruses. Previous studies point towards the superior potency of IFNβ compared to IFNα against viral infections. We conducted a three-armed, individually-randomized, open-label, controlled trial of IFNβ1a and IFNβ1b, comparing them against each other and a control group. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to IFNβ1a (subcutaneous injections of 12,000 IU on days 1, 3, 6), IFNβ1b (subcutaneous injections of 8,000,000 IU on days 1, 3, 6), or the control group. All three arms orally received Lopinavir/Ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice a day for ten days) and a single dose of Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg on the first day. Our utilized primary outcome measure was Time To Clinical Improvement (TTCI) defined as the time from enrollment to discharge or a decline of two steps on the clinical seven-step ordinal scale, whichsoever came first. A total of 60 severely ill patients with positive RT-PCR and Chest CT scans underwent randomization (20 patients to each arm). In the Intention-To-Treat population, IFNβ1a was associated with a significant difference against the control group, in the TTCI; (HR; 2.36, 95% CI 1.10-5.17, P-value = 0.031) while the IFNβ1b indicated no significant difference compared with the control; HR; 1.42, (95% CI 0.63-3.16, P-value = 0.395). The median TTCI for both of the intervention groups was five days vs. seven days for the control group. The mortality was numerically lower in both of the intervention groups (20% in the IFNβ1a group and 30% in the IFNβ1b group vs. 45% in the control group). There were no significant differences between the three arms regarding the adverse events. In patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, as compared with the base therapeutic regiment, the benefit of a significant reduction in TTCI was observed in the IFNβ1a arm. This finding needs further confirmation in larger studies.Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343768. (Submitted: 08/04/2020; First Online: 13/04/2020) (Registration Number: NCT04343768).

摘要

1 型干扰素(IFN)已被证明对冠状病毒有积极作用。先前的研究表明,IFNβ 比 IFNα 对病毒感染具有更强的效力。我们进行了一项三臂、个体随机、开放标签、对照试验,比较了 IFNβ1a 和 IFNβ1b,将它们相互比较,并与对照组进行比较。患者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配到 IFNβ1a(皮下注射 12000IU,第 1、3、6 天)、IFNβ1b(皮下注射 8000000IU,第 1、3、6 天)或对照组。所有三组患者均口服洛匹那韦/利托那韦(每天两次,每次 400/100mg,共 10 天)和羟氯喹单剂量 400mg,第 1 天。我们使用的主要疗效指标是临床改善时间(TTCI),定义为从入组到出院或临床 7 级量表下降 2 级的时间,以先发生者为准。共有 60 名 RT-PCR 和胸部 CT 扫描阳性的重症患者进行了随机分组(每组 20 例)。在意向治疗人群中,IFNβ1a 与对照组相比,TTCI 差异有统计学意义;(HR;2.36,95%CI1.10-5.17,P 值=0.031),而 IFNβ1b 与对照组相比无显著差异;HR;1.42,(95%CI0.63-3.16,P 值=0.395)。两组干预组的中位 TTCI 均为 5 天,对照组为 7 天。在两个干预组中,死亡率均低于对照组(IFNβ1a 组为 20%,IFNβ1b 组为 30%,对照组为 45%)。三组之间的不良事件无显著差异。在实验室确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者中,与基础治疗方案相比,IFNβ1a 组 TTCI 显著降低。这一发现需要更大规模的研究进一步证实。试验注册编号:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04343768。(提交日期:2020 年 8 月 4 日;首次在线日期:2020 年 4 月 13 日)(注册号:NCT04343768)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3865/8044200/cfec989323e8/41598_2021_86859_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验