Palamà Zefferino, Nesti Martina, Robles Antonio Gianluca, Scarà Antonio, Romano Silvio, Cavarretta Elena, Penco Maria, Delise Pietro, Rillo Mariano, Calò Leonardo, Sciarra Luigi
Electrophysiology Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Verde", Via Golfo di Taranto, 22, Taranto, Italy.
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 28;2022:9295326. doi: 10.1155/2022/9295326. eCollection 2022.
In spite of technological progress and the improving skills of operators, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation results appear to date to be at a plateau. In any case, the superiority of ablation over pharmacological therapy in terms of effectiveness, reduction of hospitalizations, and improvement has been well demonstrated in recent randomized trials. Triggers, substrate, and modulating factors (elements of Coumel's triangle) play different roles in paroxysmal and persistent AF, so induction and perpetuation mechanisms of arrhythmia may be different in each patient. Although effective ablative strategies are available for the treatment of paroxysmal AF triggers and persistent AF substrates, an adequate clinical evaluation of the patient is crucial in order to increase the chances of success. Recognizing triggers allows not only performing an effective ablation but also to avoid unnecessary lesions and at the same time reducing the risk of complications. AF beginning and triggers could be recorded by 12-lead ECG, continuous Holter monitoring, or implantable devices. In case of an unsuccessful noninvasive evaluation, nonpulmonary vein triggers should be investigated with an electrophysiological study. Persistent AF needs more effort to perform an accurate substrate characterization. Among the many methods proposed, recently the use of high-density mapping and multipolar catheters seems of particular benefit in order to clarify the arrhythmia mechanisms. Surgical and hybrid techniques allow to treat regions such as the posterior wall or Bachmann's bundle, which is fundamental for an ablative strategy that goes beyond just pulmonary vein isolation. Too often, patients are referred to electrophysiology laboratories without adequate preprocedural screening and planning in order to submit them to a standard "ready-made" procedure. The accurate search for triggers in paroxysmal AF and the correct recognition of the link between a possible underlying heart disease and the substrate in persistent AF could allow us to tailor the interventional approach in order to overcome the current plateau, increasing ablative procedure success and minimizing complications.
尽管技术不断进步且操作者技能有所提高,但迄今为止,房颤消融的效果似乎已处于平台期。无论如何,近期的随机试验已充分证明,消融在有效性、减少住院次数及改善病情方面优于药物治疗。触发因素、基质和调节因素(库梅尔三角的要素)在阵发性房颤和持续性房颤中发挥着不同作用,因此心律失常的诱发和持续机制在每位患者中可能有所不同。虽然有有效的消融策略可用于治疗阵发性房颤的触发因素和持续性房颤的基质,但对患者进行充分的临床评估对于提高成功率至关重要。识别触发因素不仅能进行有效的消融,还能避免不必要的损伤,同时降低并发症风险。房颤的起始和触发因素可通过12导联心电图、连续动态心电图监测或植入式设备记录。若无创评估未成功,应通过电生理检查来探究非肺静脉触发因素。持续性房颤需要更多努力来准确表征基质。在众多提出的方法中,最近使用高密度标测和多极导管似乎特别有助于阐明心律失常机制。手术和杂交技术可用于治疗后壁或巴赫曼束等区域,这对于超越单纯肺静脉隔离的消融策略至关重要。患者常常在没有充分的术前筛查和规划的情况下就被转诊至电生理实验室,以便接受标准 的“现成”手术。准确寻找阵发性房颤的触发因素以及正确认识持续性房颤中潜在心脏病与基质之间的联系,可能使我们能够量身定制介入方法,以突破当前的平台期,提高消融手术的成功率并将并发症降至最低。