Vahedian-Azimi Amir, Bashar Farshid Rahimi, Jafarabadi Mohammad A, Stahl Jennifer, Miller Andrew C
Trauma Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):206-212. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_29_20. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Protocolized ventilator weaning (PW) strategies utilizing spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) result in shorter intubation duration and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). We compared respiratory therapy (RT)-driven PW versus usual care (UC) as it pertains to physiologic respiratory parameters, intubation duration, extubation success/reintubation rates, and ICU LOS.
prospective, multicentric, randomized controlled trial was performed in closed medical and surgical ICUs with 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage at six academic medical centers in a resource-limited setting from October 18, 2007, to May 03, 2014. Extubation readiness was determined by the attending physician (UC) or the respiratory therapist (PW) using predefined criteria and SBT. Physiologic variables, serial blood gas measurements, and weaning indices were assessed including the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI), negative inspiratory force (NIF), occlusion pressure (P0.1), and dynamic and static compliance (C and C).
total of 5502 patients were randomized (PW 2787; UC 2715), of which 167 patients died without ventilator weaning (PW 90; UC 77) and 645 patients were excluded (PW 365; UC 280). Finally, a total of 4200 patients were analyzed (PW 2075; UC 2125). The PW group displayed improvements in minute ventilation ( < 0.001), C and C(both < 0.05), P0.1 ( < 0.001), NIF ( < 0.001), and RSBI ( < 0.001). Early re-intubation (≤48 h) rates were lower in the PW group (16.7% vs. 24.8%; < 0.0001), as were late re-intubation rates (5.2% vs. 25.8%; < 0.0001). Intubation duration was longer in the PW group ( < 0.001), however, hospital LOS was shorter ( < 0.001). Mortality was unchanged ( = 0.19).
PW with RT-driven extubation decisions is safe, effective, and associated with decreased re-intubation (early and late), shorter hospital stays, increased intubation duration (statistically but not clinically significant), and unchanged in-patient mortality.
采用自主呼吸试验(SBT)的程序化撤机(PW)策略可缩短气管插管持续时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)。我们比较了呼吸治疗(RT)驱动的PW与常规治疗(UC)在生理呼吸参数、气管插管持续时间、拔管成功率/再插管率以及ICU LOS方面的差异。
2007年10月18日至2014年5月3日,在资源有限环境下的6个学术医疗中心的封闭式内科和外科ICU进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验,这些ICU有全天24小时在岗的重症医学专家。由主治医师(UC)或呼吸治疗师(PW)使用预定义标准和SBT来确定拔管准备情况。评估生理变量、系列血气测量结果和撤机指标,包括快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)、吸气负压(NIF)、阻断压(P0.1)以及动态和静态顺应性(C和C)。
共有5502例患者被随机分组(PW组2787例;UC组2715例),其中167例患者未进行撤机即死亡(PW组90例;UC组77例),645例患者被排除(PW组365例;UC组280例)。最终,共对4200例患者进行了分析(PW组2075例;UC组2125例)。PW组在分钟通气量(<0.001)、C和C(均<0.05)、P0.1(<0.001)、NIF(<0.001)以及RSBI(<0.001)方面有改善。PW组早期再插管(≤48小时)率较低(16.7%对24.8%;<0.0001),晚期再插管率也较低(5.2%对25.8%;<0.0001)。PW组气管插管持续时间较长(<0.001),然而,住院LOS较短(<0.001)。死亡率未改变(=0.19)。
由RT驱动拔管决策的PW是安全、有效的,且与再插管率降低(早期和晚期)、住院时间缩短、气管插管持续时间延长(统计学上有意义但临床无显著差异)以及住院患者死亡率未改变相关。