Rotstein Dalia L, Marrie Ruth Ann, Tu Karen, Schultz Susan E, Fung Kinwah, Maxwell Colleen J
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0234876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234876. eCollection 2020.
Access to neurology specialty care can influence outcomes in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), but may vary based on patient sociodemographic characteristics, including immigration status.
To compare health services utilization in the year of MS diagnosis, one year before diagnosis and two years after diagnosis in immigrants versus long-term residents in Ontario, Canada.
We identified incident cases of MS among adults aged 20-65 years by applying a validated algorithm to health administrative data in Ontario, Canada, a region with universal health insurance and comprehensive coverage. We separately assessed hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient neurology visits, other outpatient specialty visits, and primary care visits. We compared rates of health service use in immigrants versus long-term residents using negative binomial regression models with generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, MS diagnosis calendar year, and comorbidity burden.
From 2003 to 2014, there were 13,028 incident MS cases in Ontario, of whom 1,070 (8.2%) were immigrants. As compared to long-term residents, rates of hospitalization were similar (Adjusted rate ratio (ARR) 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.01) in immigrants the year before MS diagnosis, but outpatient neurology visits (ARR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.99) were slightly less frequent. However, immigrants had higher rates of hospitalization during the diagnosis year (ARR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39), and had greater use of outpatient neurology (ARR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12-1.23) but fewer ED visits (ARR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). In the first post-diagnosis year, immigrants continued to have greater numbers of outpatient neurology visits (ARR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.23), but had fewer hospitalizations (ARR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94).
Overall, our findings were reassuring concerning health services access for immigrants with MS in Ontario, a publicly funded health care system. However, immigrants were more likely to be hospitalized despite greater use of outpatient neurology care in the year of MS diagnosis. Reasons for this may include more severe disease presentation or lack of social support among immigrants and warrant further investigation.
获得神经科专科护理会影响多发性硬化症(MS)患者的治疗结果,但可能因患者的社会人口学特征(包括移民身份)而有所不同。
比较加拿大安大略省移民与长期居民在MS诊断当年、诊断前一年和诊断后两年的医疗服务利用情况。
我们通过对加拿大安大略省的卫生行政数据应用经过验证的算法,确定了20至65岁成年人中的MS新发病例,该地区拥有全民医疗保险和全面覆盖。我们分别评估了住院、急诊就诊、门诊神经科就诊、其他门诊专科就诊和初级保健就诊情况。我们使用负二项回归模型和广义估计方程,对年龄、性别、社会经济地位、城乡居住情况、MS诊断日历年和合并症负担进行调整,比较了移民与长期居民的医疗服务使用率。
2003年至2014年,安大略省有13,028例MS新发病例,其中1,070例(8.2%)为移民。与长期居民相比,移民在MS诊断前一年的住院率相似(调整率比(ARR)0.86;95%置信区间:0.73 - 1.01),但门诊神经科就诊频率略低(ARR 0.93;95%置信区间:0.87 - 0.99)。然而,移民在诊断当年的住院率较高(ARR 1.20,95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.39),门诊神经科就诊次数更多(ARR 1.17,95%置信区间:1.12 - 1.23),但急诊就诊次数较少(ARR 0.86;95%置信区间:0.78 - 0.96)。在诊断后的第一年,移民继续有更多的门诊神经科就诊次数(ARR 1.16;95%置信区间:1.10 - 1.23),但住院次数较少(ARR 0.79;95%置信区间:0.67 - 0.94)。
总体而言,我们的研究结果对于安大略省由公共资金资助的医疗保健系统中患有MS的移民获得医疗服务的情况令人放心。然而,尽管移民在MS诊断当年更多地使用门诊神经科护理,但他们住院的可能性更大。其原因可能包括移民中疾病表现更严重或缺乏社会支持,值得进一步调查。