• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NHS 健康检查计划:一项现实主义审查的方案。

NHS Health Check programme: a protocol for a realist review.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e048937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048937.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048937
PMID:33853809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054100/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The NHS Health Check aims to identify individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among the adult population in England. The Health Check includes calculation of CVD risk and discussion of pharmacological and lifestyle approaches to manage risk, including referral to lifestyle support services. The programme is commissioned by Local Authorities (LAs) and is delivered by a range of different providers in different settings. There is significant variation in activity, with uptake ranging from 25% to 85% in different areas, and clear evidence of variation in implementation and delivery practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We aim to understand how the NHS Health Check programme works in different settings, for different groups, so that we can recommend improvements to maximise intended outcomes. To do so, we will undertake a realist review and a survey of LA public health teams. Our review will follow Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locate existing theories, (2) search for evidence, (3) article selection, (4) extract and organise data and (5) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions. Our review will include documents describing local implementation alongside published research studies. We will recruit a stakeholder group (including Public Health England, commissioners and providers of Health Checks, plus members of the public and patients) to advise us throughout. Our survey will be sent to all 152 LAs in England to gather detailed information on programme delivery (including COVID-19-related changes) and available referral services. This will enable us to map delivery across England and relate these data to programme outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review. For the survey, we have received approval from the University of Kent Research Ethics Committee. Our findings will be used to develop recommendations on tailoring, implementation and design strategies to improve delivery of the NHS Health Check in different settings, for different groups.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020163822.

摘要

简介

国民保健制度 (NHS) 健康检查旨在识别英格兰成年人口中心血管疾病 (CVD) 风险增加的个体。健康检查包括 CVD 风险计算以及讨论药物和生活方式方法来管理风险,包括向生活方式支持服务转介。该计划由地方当局 (LAs) 委托,由不同环境下的各种不同提供者执行。活动存在显著差异,不同地区的参与率从 25%到 85%不等,并且在实施和交付实践方面存在明显的差异。

方法和分析

我们旨在了解 NHS 健康检查计划在不同环境中、针对不同群体的运作方式,以便我们能够提出改进建议以最大限度地提高预期效果。为此,我们将进行现实主义审查和对地方公共卫生团队的调查。我们的审查将遵循 Pawson 的五个迭代阶段:(1)定位现有理论,(2)搜索证据,(3)文章选择,(4)提取和组织数据,以及(5)综合证据并得出结论。我们的审查将包括描述当地实施情况的文件以及已发表的研究报告。我们将招募一个利益相关者小组(包括英格兰公共卫生署、健康检查的委托人和提供者,以及公众和患者),在整个过程中为我们提供建议。我们的调查将发送给英格兰所有 152 个地方当局,以收集有关计划交付(包括与 COVID-19 相关的变化)和可用转介服务的详细信息。这将使我们能够绘制英格兰各地的交付情况,并将这些数据与计划结果相关联。

伦理和传播

本综述不需要伦理批准。对于调查,我们已获得肯特大学研究伦理委员会的批准。我们的发现将用于制定有关定制、实施和设计策略的建议,以改善不同环境中、针对不同群体的 NHS 健康检查的交付。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020163822。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3000/8054100/4e9c7eca10e5/bmjopen-2021-048937f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3000/8054100/4e9c7eca10e5/bmjopen-2021-048937f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3000/8054100/4e9c7eca10e5/bmjopen-2021-048937f01.jpg

相似文献

1
NHS Health Check programme: a protocol for a realist review.NHS 健康检查计划:一项现实主义审查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e048937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048937.
2
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.NHS 健康检查后会发生什么?一项调查和现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127.
3
Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.用于支持国民保健制度健康检查计划决策的建模工具:研讨会、系统评价以及与用户的共同制作。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(35):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta25350.
4
The NHS Health Check programme: a survey of programme delivery in England before and after the Covid-19 pandemic response.英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查计划:对新冠疫情应对前后英格兰地区该计划实施情况的一项调查。
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Aug 25;3:32. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13436.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): a realist review protocol.英国 COVID-19 大流行经验下的健康访视(RReHOPE):一项现实审查方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 8;13(3):e068544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068544.
6
Understanding what happens to attendees after an NHS Health Check: a realist review.了解 NHS 健康检查后参与者的情况:一个现实主义的综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e064237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064237.
7
The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: A microsimulation study.英格兰国民保健署健康检查心血管疾病预防计划的当前和潜在健康益处:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002517. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Understanding the use of the National Early Warning Score 2 in acute care settings: a realist review protocol.理解国家早期预警评分 2 在急性护理环境中的使用:一个真实主义综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e062154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062154.
9
Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study.与利益相关者合作,为 NHS 健康检查计划开发决策支持工具:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 11;20(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5.
10
Integrating palliative care and heart failure: a protocol for a realist synthesis (PalliatHeartSynthesis).将姑息治疗与心力衰竭相结合:一项真实世界综合研究方案(PalliatHeartSynthesis)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):e058848. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058848.

引用本文的文献

1
Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review.对于患有包括痴呆症在内的多种长期病症的老年人,从医院到家庭的过渡是否有效?一项实在论综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 9;25(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06123-0.
2
Modelling a two-stage adult population screen for autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolaemia: cross-sectional analysis within the UK Biobank.对常染色体显性家族性高胆固醇血症进行两阶段成年人群筛查的模型构建:英国生物银行内的横断面分析
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Oct 29;1(1):e000021. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000021. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): Protocol for a realist review.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the uptake and delivery of the NHS Health Check programme in England, using primary care data from 9.5 million people: a cross-sectional study.利用来自 950 万人的初级保健数据评估英格兰国民保健制度健康检查计划的参与和实施情况:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e042963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042963.
2
Quantitative examination of video-recorded NHS Health Checks: comparison of the use of QRISK2 versus JBS3 cardiovascular risk calculators.国民健康服务体系(NHS)健康检查视频记录的定量检查:QRISK2与JBS3心血管风险计算器使用情况的比较
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e037790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037790.
3
精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物处方选择中的共享决策干预措施(SHAPE): 一项实际审查的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0304626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304626. eCollection 2024.
4
A Machine Learning Model to Aid Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.一种辅助检测家族性高胆固醇血症的机器学习模型。
JACC Adv. 2023 May 24;2(4):100333. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100333. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
The usage of data in NHS primary care commissioning: a realist evaluation.NHS 初级保健委托中数据的使用:一项现实主义评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Dec 14;24(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02193-4.
6
Improving access to general practice for people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a realist review protocol (The Connection Study).改善严重和多重弱势群体获得全科医疗服务的机会:一项实在论综述方案(关联研究)
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Oct 11;8:331. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19460.2. eCollection 2023.
7
Understanding primary care diagnosis and management of sleep disturbance for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a realist review protocol.理解痴呆或轻度认知障碍患者的初级保健诊断和睡眠障碍管理:一项现实主义综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067424.
8
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review.在不断变化的治疗、技术和监管环境下改善家庭药物流产体验:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e066650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650.
9
Understanding what happens to attendees after an NHS Health Check: a realist review.了解 NHS 健康检查后参与者的情况:一个现实主义的综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e064237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064237.
10
Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.优化全科医生提供建议的沟通方式,以促进患者的自我护理,并在诊断不确定时及时进行随访:初级保健中“安全网”的实际审查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):541-554. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Fidelity of the delivery of NHS Health Checks in general practice: an observational study.
国民保健服务(NHS)健康检查在全科医疗中的提供准确性:一项观察性研究。
BJGP Open. 2020 Oct 27;4(4). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101077. Print 2020 Oct.
4
Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.对英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查行为的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2.
5
A protocol paper: community engagement interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in socially disadvantaged populations in the UK: an implementation research study.一份方案文件:英国社会弱势群体心血管疾病预防的社区参与干预措施:一项实施研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Mar 12;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-0131-1. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial.基于计步器的极简短身体活动干预在英格兰国民保健署健康检查中的效果评估:VBI 随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 6;17(3):e1003046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003046. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Evaluation of the Diabetes Screening Component of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme in England: a Retrospective Cohort Study.英格兰国家心血管风险评估计划中糖尿病筛查部分的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):1231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58033-3.
8
A systematic review of factors influencing NHS health check uptake: invitation methods, patient characteristics, and the impact of interventions.系统评价影响国民保健服务健康检查参与的因素:邀请方法、患者特征以及干预措施的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7889-4.
9
Increasing uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of enhanced invitation letters in Northamptonshire, England.提高初级保健中国民保健服务健康检查的参与率:英格兰北安普顿增强邀请信的实用随机对照试验。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Apr 12;43(1):e92-e99. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz134.
10
Engagement with advice to reduce cardiovascular risk following a health check programme: A qualitative study.健康检查计划后建议降低心血管风险的参与度:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):193-201. doi: 10.1111/hex.12991. Epub 2019 Oct 23.