Suppr超能文献

两种不确定性来源独立调节时间预期。

Two sources of uncertainty independently modulate temporal expectancy.

作者信息

Grabenhorst Matthias, Maloney Laurence T, Poeppel David, Michalareas Georgios

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Max-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt 60322, Germany;

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019342118.

Abstract

The environment is shaped by two sources of temporal uncertainty: the discrete probability of whether an event will occur and-if it does-the continuous probability of when it will happen. These two types of uncertainty are fundamental to every form of anticipatory behavior including learning, decision-making, and motor planning. It remains unknown how the brain models the two uncertainty parameters and how they interact in anticipation. It is commonly assumed that the discrete probability of whether an event will occur has a fixed effect on event expectancy over time. In contrast, we first demonstrate that this pattern is highly dynamic and monotonically increases across time. Intriguingly, this behavior is independent of the continuous probability of when an event will occur. The effect of this continuous probability on anticipation is commonly proposed to be driven by the hazard rate (HR) of events. We next show that the HR fails to account for behavior and propose a model of event expectancy based on the probability density function of events. Our results hold for both vision and audition, suggesting independence of the representation of the two uncertainties from sensory input modality. These findings enrich the understanding of fundamental anticipatory processes and have provocative implications for many aspects of behavior and its neural underpinnings.

摘要

环境由两种时间不确定性来源塑造

事件是否会发生的离散概率,以及如果事件发生,它何时发生的连续概率。这两种不确定性对于包括学习、决策和运动规划在内的各种预期行为形式都至关重要。大脑如何对这两个不确定性参数进行建模以及它们在预期中如何相互作用仍然未知。人们通常认为事件是否会发生的离散概率会随着时间对事件预期产生固定影响。相比之下,我们首先证明这种模式是高度动态的,并且会随着时间单调增加。有趣的是,这种行为与事件何时发生的连续概率无关。通常认为这种连续概率对预期的影响是由事件的危险率(HR)驱动的。我们接下来表明危险率无法解释行为,并基于事件的概率密度函数提出了一个事件预期模型。我们的结果在视觉和听觉方面都成立,这表明这两种不确定性的表征与感觉输入模态无关。这些发现丰富了对基本预期过程的理解,并对行为及其神经基础的许多方面具有启发性意义。

相似文献

2
The anticipation of events in time.对时间事件的预期。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 20;10(1):5802. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13849-0.
3
The role of multisensory interplay in enabling temporal expectations.多感官相互作用在产生时间预期中的作用。
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:130-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Uncertainty and expectancy deviations require cortico-subcortical cooperation.不确定性和预期偏差需要皮质-皮质下合作。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 1;144(Pt A):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Temporal context modulates the recovery of the attentional blink.时间背景调节注意瞬脱的恢复。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Mar 28;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00625-6.
6
When temporal attention interacts with expectation.当时间注意与期望相互作用时。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 26;14(1):4624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55399-6.
9
How Does Temporal Blurring Alter Movement Timing?时滞模糊如何改变运动时机?
eNeuro. 2023 Sep 13;10(9). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0496-22.2023. Print 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Brain computation by assemblies of neurons.神经元集合的大脑计算。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14464-14472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001893117. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
The anticipation of events in time.对时间事件的预期。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 20;10(1):5802. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13849-0.
7
Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.预期时刻:注意的时间结构。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-48. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.141. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验