Figueroa-Colon R, Grunow J E
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Pediatrics, Iowa City.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 May-Jun;7(3):359-66. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198805000-00008.
In order to compare three premedication regimens, 58 children and adolescents were randomized to three groups: Group I, meperidine intramuscular; Group II, atropine intramuscular and diazepam intravenous; and Group III, meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine intramuscular. Almost all patients required supplemental intravenous diazepam or meperidine to obtain adequate sedation. An endoscopist without knowledge of the medication group scored each patient for adequacy of sedation. Sedation was more effective in Group III than in Groups I and II (p less than 0.005); however, Group III patients were less arousable at completion of the procedure (p less than 0.0005) and had a greater duration of sedation (220 min compared with 56 and 88 min for Groups I and II, respectively, p less than 0.001). Complications were minor and not associated with any specific treatment. The evidence from this study supports the following conclusions: (a) adequate sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients requires sedation with more than one of the drugs used in this study; and (b) the regimen meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine, with diazepam supplement, was superior in providing sedation, but patients required a longer period of recovery than did patients sedated with one of the other regimens.
为比较三种术前用药方案,58名儿童和青少年被随机分为三组:第一组,肌内注射哌替啶;第二组,肌内注射阿托品并静脉注射地西泮;第三组,肌内注射哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪。几乎所有患者都需要补充静脉注射地西泮或哌替啶以获得足够的镇静效果。一名不了解用药分组情况的内镜医师对每位患者的镇静充分程度进行评分。第三组的镇静效果优于第一组和第二组(p<0.005);然而,第三组患者在操作结束时较难唤醒(p<0.0005),且镇静持续时间更长(分别为220分钟,而第一组和第二组分别为56分钟和88分钟,p<0.001)。并发症轻微,且与任何特定治疗无关。本研究的证据支持以下结论:(a)小儿患者进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查时,充分镇静需要使用本研究中不止一种药物进行镇静;(b)哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪方案加用地西泮补充剂在提供镇静方面更优,但与使用其他方案之一进行镇静的患者相比,该组患者需要更长的恢复时间。