Ismail Ismail Ibrahim, Abdelkarim Ahmed, Al-Hashel Jasem Y
Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250241. eCollection 2021.
Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
A total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
Webinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change.
自新冠疫情被宣布为大流行以来,所有科学医学活动都转变为以网络研讨会的形式进行线上开展,以维持继续医学教育(CME)。我们旨在评估不同医学专业的医生对传统面对面会议突然且意外地转变为网络研讨会的态度,并提出未来的建议。
我们于2020年11月1日至11月15日使用一份包含25个条目的问卷进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查研究。该调查问卷通过滚雪球技术创建,并通过多个社交媒体平台分发给来自不同医学和外科专业以及不同国家的医生。
共有326名医生做出回应;其中165名(50.6%)为女性,回应者的平均年龄为38.7±7.5岁。大多数回复(93.2%)来自阿拉伯国家。其中,195名(59.8%)报告称与去年同期相比参加了更多的网络研讨会,平均每月3次。关于总体印象;244名(74.8%)“非常满意”或“满意”,对“培训课程”满意度最高,为268名(82.2%),对“国际会议”满意度为218名(66.9%)。然而,246名受访者(75.5%)对疫情期间网络研讨会的数量和频率感到不堪重负,171名(52.5%)报告称参加的受邀网络研讨会不到25%,205名(62.8%)不同意疫情后网络研讨会可以取代面对面会议,239名(73.3%)同意在线会议需要适当的规范。
网络研讨会是新冠疫情期间医学教育的主要途径,医生们最初总体满意。然而,这种模式转变很突然且缺乏适当规范。尽管最初满意,但大多数医生对网络研讨会的数量和频率感到不堪重负。医生的满意度对于规划未来的教育活动至关重要,鉴于当前这场危机很可能会产生长期影响,网络研讨会应被视为传统面对面方法的补充,而非替代。在本研究中,我们提出了一些建议以帮助未来对这一变化进行规范。