• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响肢体残疾人士使用社区资产的因素:哥伦比亚恩维加多参与式绘图研究结果。

Factors that influence the use of community assets by people with physical disabilities: results of participatory mapping in Envigado, Colombia.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, CES University, Medellin, Colombia.

Department of Social Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8285-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-8285-9
PMID:32019515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7001323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disability is an evolving concept that results from the complex interaction between a person with an impairment and the context in which he/she lives. There is limited understanding on the types, access and use of community assets valuable for people with disabilities, and the role of contextual factors in Colombia. Our goal with this work was to identify the factors at the levels of the socio-ecological framework, and their interaction, that influence the use of community assets among people with physical disabilities and community stakeholders in Envigado, Colombia.

METHODS

Using participatory mapping, a community based participatory approach, we carried out an assessment of community assets identified by people with disabilities and rehabilitation professionals. In-depth interviews (n = 32) informed the design of two participatory mapping activities, one among people with disabilities (n = 5) and a second with rehabilitation professionals (n = 4). Results were presented in a community forum to receive feedback on the findings.

RESULTS

Main findings indicate a chain of contextual factors that limit access and use of assets stemming from the personal (e.g. financial resources, inaccessible housing), interpersonal level (e.g. lack of a personal assistance or aid), and community levels (e.g. lack of accessible public transportation and inaccessible buildings). In most cases these barriers are heightened by system level barriers (e.g. lack of effective enforcement of the legal framework).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying these contextual factors, and their interactions, calls for stronger enforcement of the existing legal framework through articulated work between different stakeholders, so that people with disabilities can enjoy community assets.

摘要

背景

残疾是一个不断发展的概念,它是由身体损伤者与他/她所处的环境之间的复杂相互作用所导致的。对于残疾人群体有价值的社区资产的类型、获取和使用,以及哥伦比亚的情境因素在其中所起的作用,人们的理解有限。我们开展这项工作的目的是确定社会生态框架各级的因素及其相互作用,这些因素影响着哥伦比亚恩维加多的身体残疾者和社区利益相关者对社区资产的使用。

方法

我们采用基于社区的参与式方法,即参与式绘图法,对残疾人和康复专业人员所确定的社区资产进行评估。深入访谈(n=32)为两项参与式绘图活动的设计提供了信息,一项是针对残疾人(n=5),另一项是针对康复专业人员(n=4)。结果在社区论坛上展示,以获取对调查结果的反馈。

结果

主要发现表明,存在一系列限制资产获取和使用的情境因素,这些因素源于个人层面(例如经济资源、住房无法进入)、人际层面(例如缺乏个人援助或辅助)和社区层面(例如缺乏无障碍公共交通和无障碍建筑)。在大多数情况下,这些障碍因制度层面的障碍而加剧(例如缺乏对法律框架的有效执行)。

结论

确定这些情境因素及其相互作用,需要通过不同利益相关者之间的明确工作,加强现有法律框架的执行力度,以便残疾人士能够享用社区资产。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/fe9323d2a093/12889_2020_8285_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/423f25a37a72/12889_2020_8285_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/b9c012e2a73c/12889_2020_8285_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/fe9323d2a093/12889_2020_8285_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/423f25a37a72/12889_2020_8285_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/b9c012e2a73c/12889_2020_8285_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b8/7001323/fe9323d2a093/12889_2020_8285_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors that influence the use of community assets by people with physical disabilities: results of participatory mapping in Envigado, Colombia.影响肢体残疾人士使用社区资产的因素:哥伦比亚恩维加多参与式绘图研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8285-9.
2
Experiences with rehabilitation and impact on community participation among adults with physical disability in Colombia: perspectives from stakeholders using a community based research approach.哥伦比亚身体残疾成年人康复经历及其对社区参与的影响:基于社区的研究方法中利益相关者的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0923-4.
3
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
4
Navigating new normals: the influence of COVID-19 policies on community access and well-being of people with mobility disabilities in everyday life.探索新常态:COVID-19 政策对日常生活中行动障碍人士的社区融入和福祉的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 4;12:1401777. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401777. eCollection 2024.
5
"": access to HIV information and services among persons with disabilities in Ghana, Uganda, and Zambia."": 加纳、乌干达和赞比亚残疾人获取艾滋病毒信息和服务的情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(3):335-348. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498138. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
Enabling participation for disabled young people: study protocol.促进残疾青年参与:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 8;18(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5652-x.
7
Community participation of persons with disabilities: volunteering, donations and involvement in groups and organisations.残疾人的社区参与:志愿服务、捐赠以及参与团体和组织。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Aug;38(17):1705-15. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107643. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
[Health assets and quality of life in people diagnosed with severe mental disorder].[被诊断患有严重精神障碍者的健康资产与生活质量]
Gac Sanit. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
An emancipatory research on CBR and the barriers faced by persons with disabilities.一项关于社区康复及残疾人所面临障碍的解放性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(18):1502-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.800914. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
10
Using Photovoice as a participatory method to identify and strategize community participation with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.运用照片声音法作为一种参与式方法,以确定智障和发育障碍人群的社区参与情况并制定相关策略。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2018 Sep;25(5):382-395. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1502350. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges.手动轮椅使用者的社区移动性与参与度评估:当前技术与挑战综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 5;17:1331395. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1331395. eCollection 2023.
2
Asset mapping score analysis: a novel public health research methodology applied to maternal and child health resources in New Orleans.资产映射评分分析:一种应用于新奥尔良母婴健康资源的新型公共卫生研究方法。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;81(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01042-1.
3
Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences with rehabilitation and impact on community participation among adults with physical disability in Colombia: perspectives from stakeholders using a community based research approach.哥伦比亚身体残疾成年人康复经历及其对社区参与的影响:基于社区的研究方法中利益相关者的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0923-4.
2
Home Modifications to Reduce Disability in Older Adults With Functional Disability.居家改造以减少功能残疾老年人的残疾状况
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):211-212. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6414.
3
Effect of a Biobehavioral Environmental Approach on Disability Among Low-Income Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
促进健康的社区资产维度。一项系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115758.
4
Individual quality of life and the environment - towards a concept of livable areas for persons with disabilities in Poland.个人生活质量与环境——迈向波兰残疾人宜居区域的概念。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10797-7.
生物行为环境方法对低收入老年残疾人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):204-211. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6026.
4
Combining survey data, GIS and qualitative interviews in the analysis of health service access for persons with disabilities.在分析残疾人获得卫生服务的情况时结合调查数据、地理信息系统和定性访谈。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0166-2.
5
Mapping review of accessible pedestrian infrastructures for individuals with physical disabilities.针对身体残疾人士的无障碍行人基础设施映射综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 May;14(4):410-422. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1449018. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
A nationwide Danish survey on the use of green spaces by people with mobility disabilities.一项关于丹麦全国范围内行动不便人士对绿色空间使用情况的调查。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Aug;46(6):597-605. doi: 10.1177/1403494817745188. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Wheelchair users, access and exclusion in South African higher education.南非高等教育中的轮椅使用者、无障碍与排斥问题。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:353. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.353. eCollection 2017.
8
Inclusive design in architectural practice: Experiential learning of disability in architectural education.建筑实践中的包容性设计:建筑教育中的残疾体验式学习。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices.环境障碍对参与度的影响和三种辅助技术设备使用的促进因素。
Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68-76. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1363828. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations.体验残疾一天:残疾模拟带来的意料之外的负面影响。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Aug;62(3):324-333. doi: 10.1037/rep0000127. Epub 2017 Mar 13.