Suppr超能文献

实施以工作场所健康和心理健康为重点的实践:系统评价。

Implementing practices focused on workplace health and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review.

机构信息

Employment Systems and Institutions Group, Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Employment Systems and Institutions Group, Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113888. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113888. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Workplace health and wellbeing practices (WHWPs) often fail to improve psychological health or wellbeing because of implementation failure. Thus, implementation should be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of WHWPs.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review to identify critical success factors for WHWP implementation and gaps in the evidence. Doing so provides a platform for future theoretical development.

METHODS

We reviewed 74 separate studies that assessed the implementation of WHWPs and their effects on psychological health or psychological wellbeing. Most studies were from advanced industrial Western democracies (71). Intervention types included primary (e.g., work redesign, 37 studies; and health behavior change, 8 studies), secondary (e.g., mindfulness training, 11 studies), tertiary (e.g., focused on rehabilitation, 9 studies), and multifocal (e.g., including components of primary and secondary, 9 studies).

RESULTS

Tangible changes preceded improvements in health and wellbeing, indicating intervention success cannot be attributed to non-specific factors. Some interventions had beneficial effects through mechanisms not planned as part of the intervention. Three factors were associated with successful WHWP implementation: continuation, learning, and effective governance.

CONCLUSIONS

The review indicates future research could focus on how organizations manage conflict between WHWP implementation and existing organizational processes, and the dynamic nature of organizational contexts that affect and are affected by WHWP implementation. This systematic review is registered [PROSPERO: the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42019119656].

摘要

理由

工作场所健康和福利实践(WHWPs)常常由于实施失败而未能改善心理健康或幸福感。因此,应评估实施情况,以提高 WHWPs 的有效性。

目的

我们进行了系统审查,以确定 WHWP 实施的关键成功因素和证据中的差距。这样做为未来的理论发展提供了一个平台。

方法

我们审查了 74 项单独评估 WHWPs 实施及其对心理健康或心理幸福感影响的研究。大多数研究来自先进的工业化西方民主国家(71 项)。干预类型包括初级(例如,工作重新设计,37 项;健康行为改变,8 项)、二级(例如,正念训练,11 项)、三级(例如,专注于康复,9 项)和多焦点(例如,包括初级和二级的组成部分,9 项)。

结果

有形的变化先于健康和幸福感的改善,这表明干预的成功不能归因于非特定因素。一些干预措施通过计划干预措施之外的机制产生了有益的效果。有三个因素与 WHWP 实施的成功相关:延续性、学习和有效的治理。

结论

审查表明,未来的研究可以集中于组织如何管理 WHWP 实施与现有组织流程之间的冲突,以及影响和受 WHWP 实施影响的组织环境的动态性质。本系统评价已在[PROSPERO:国际前瞻性系统评价登记册 ID:CRD42019119656]进行注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验