• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The politicians' perspectives on participation in mammographic screening: an interview-based study from a region in Sweden.政治家对参与乳腺钼靶筛查的看法:一项来自瑞典某地区的访谈式研究。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;79(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00576-6.
2
Non-participation in mammographic screening - experiences of women from a region in Sweden.不参与乳房 X 光筛查 - 瑞典一地区女性的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8306-8.
3
Experiences and perceptions about undergoing mammographic screening: a qualitative study involving women from a county in Sweden.接受乳房 X 光筛查的体验和看法:一项涉及瑞典一县妇女的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1521256. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1521256.
4
Politicians' views on societal responsibility and possibility to promote newly arrived migrants' health in Sweden.瑞典政客对社会责任以及促进新移民健康的可能性的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Aug 1;38(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab199.
5
Public dialogue on healthcare prioritisation.关于医疗保健优先事项的公众对话。
Health Policy. 2006 Nov;79(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
6
Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?瑞典医疗保健中的优先事项设定:政治家们准备好了吗?
Scand J Public Health. 2014 May;42(3):227-34. doi: 10.1177/1403494813520355. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Swedish politicians' view of obstacles when dealing with priority settings in health care.瑞典政治家对医疗保健优先级设定过程中障碍的看法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(4):532-42. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2014-0131.
8
Political strategies in difficult times - The "backstage" experience of Swedish politicians on formal priority setting in healthcare.艰难时期的政治策略——瑞典政治家在医疗保健正式优先事项设定方面的“幕后”经历
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;163:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.046. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Factors Influencing the Mammographic Screening Practices of South Asian Women in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Study.影响香港南亚裔女性乳腺钼靶筛查行为的因素:一项定性研究
Cancer Nurs. 2025;48(4):298-306. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001332. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
10
Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.从国际医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,女性在风险分层乳腺癌筛查和预防方面的决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
To facilitate realisation of access, participation, and equity in healthcare: an interview study with policy makers in a Swedish region.促进医疗保健领域的可及性、参与度和公平性:对瑞典一个地区政策制定者的访谈研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2147. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23263-5.
2
Development of a Mobile-Based Self-care Application for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Iran.开发一款针对伊朗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的移动自我护理应用程序。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):935-948. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757295. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics, health policy-making and the economic crisis: a qualitative interview study with European policy-makers.伦理、卫生政策制定与经济危机:对欧洲政策制定者的定性访谈研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Sep 14;18(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1050-y.
2
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.严重性作为优先设置标准:制定具有挑战性的研究议程。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):25-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00371-z.
3
Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review.德国移民和非移民在医疗保健利用方面的不平等:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 1;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0876-z.
4
Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.乳腺 X 光摄影设施的地理位置可达性和乳腺 X 光筛查的频率。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):65-71.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?人群筛查中乳腺癌的过度诊断:这是否会使乳腺筛查变得毫无价值?
Cancer Biol Med. 2017 Feb;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0050.
6
Non-attendance of mammographic screening: the roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample.乳腺钼靶筛查未参加情况:年龄和直辖市在瑞典基于人群样本中的作用
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Dec 30;14:157. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0291-7.
7
Improving access: modifying Penchansky and Thomas's Theory of Access.改善可及性:修正彭钱斯基和托马斯的可及性理论。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jan;21(1):36-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819615600001. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.健康素养与癌症筛查:一项系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Distance to screening site and non-participation in screening for breast cancer: a population-based study.与乳腺癌筛查地点的距离及未参与乳腺癌筛查:一项基于人群的研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun;36(2):292-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt068. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:一项独立评审。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

政治家对参与乳腺钼靶筛查的看法:一项来自瑞典某地区的访谈式研究。

The politicians' perspectives on participation in mammographic screening: an interview-based study from a region in Sweden.

作者信息

Norfjord van Zyl Maria, Tillgren Per, Asp Margareta

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden.

Division of Caring Sciences and Health Care Pedagogics, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;79(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00576-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-021-00576-6
PMID:33865449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type among women globally. To facilitate early detection, all 40-74-year-old female residents of Sweden are invited to participate in a population-based mammographic screening programme. Approximately 20% of all invited women decline the offer, and if this is due to systematic differences that can be adjusted, it can indicate inequity in healthcare. Assessment of and being updated about the health and healthcare of the residents are largely the responsibilities of the self-governed regions in Sweden. The understanding of the residents' health serves as a basis for decision making and priority setting. This study aims to describe how politicians representing a region in Sweden perceive women's participation in mammographic screening and the politicians' own possibility to promote such participation.

METHODS

Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on the data obtained from individual semi-structured interviews held in 2019. The interviewees comprised ten politicians (six women and four men, 38-71 years old) representing a sub-committee focusing on public health and healthcare issues.

RESULTS

Two main themes have been identified: 1) expected actions and 2) expected conditions for acting, including a total of four sub-themes. According to the politicians, the expected actions, such as obtaining information and being updated about matters regarding mammographic screening, concern both the women invited to the screening and the politicians themselves. Additionally, for both the individual and the healthcare organisation, here represented by the politicians, expected actions entail a shared commitment to maintain health. The expected conditions for acting refer to the politician's awareness of the factors influencing the women's decision to undergo or refuse the screening and having the resources to enable taking actions to facilitate participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Expected actions and expected conditions for acting are tightly connected and entail some form of prioritisation by the politicians. Setting the priorities can be based on information about the purpose of the screening and an understanding of social determinants' impacts on women's decision to refrain from mammographic screening, as well as available resources.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的癌症类型。为促进早期检测,瑞典邀请所有40至74岁的女性居民参加基于人群的乳房X线筛查项目。所有受邀女性中约有20%拒绝邀请,如果这是由于可以调整的系统性差异导致的,那么这可能表明医疗保健存在不公平现象。评估并了解居民的健康状况及医疗保健情况在很大程度上是瑞典自治地区的职责。对居民健康状况的了解是决策和确定优先事项的基础。本研究旨在描述代表瑞典一个地区的政治家如何看待女性参与乳房X线筛查以及政治家自身促进这种参与的可能性。

方法

对2019年进行的个人半结构式访谈所获数据进行定性主题分析。受访者包括代表一个关注公共卫生和医疗保健问题的小组委员会的十名政治家(六名女性和四名男性,年龄在38至71岁之间)。

结果

确定了两个主要主题:1)预期行动和2)行动的预期条件,包括总共四个子主题。据政治家们称,预期行动,如获取有关乳房X线筛查事项的信息并了解最新情况,既涉及受邀参加筛查的女性,也涉及政治家自身。此外,对于个人和由政治家代表的医疗保健组织而言,预期行动都需要共同致力于维护健康。行动的预期条件是指政治家意识到影响女性决定接受或拒绝筛查的因素,并拥有采取行动促进参与的资源。

结论

预期行动和行动的预期条件紧密相连,需要政治家进行某种形式的优先排序。确定优先事项可基于有关筛查目的的信息、对社会决定因素对女性拒绝乳房X线筛查决定的影响的理解以及可用资源。