• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology.生物识别面部识别技术的伦理应用。
AI Soc. 2022;37(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
The ethics of facial recognition technologies, surveillance, and accountability in an age of artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of US, EU, and UK regulatory frameworks.人工智能时代面部识别技术、监控与问责的伦理:美国、欧盟和英国监管框架的比较分析
AI Ethics. 2022;2(3):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00077-w. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Facial recognition technology: regulations, rights and the rule of law.面部识别技术:法规、权利与法治
Front Big Data. 2024 Jun 4;7:1354659. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1354659. eCollection 2024.
4
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.数字表型工具在精神健康应用中的伦理发展:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343.
5
Using Facial Recognition Tools for Health Assessment.利用人脸识别工具进行健康评估。
Plast Surg Nurs. 2021;41(2):112-116. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000357.
6
Beyond surveillance: privacy, ethics, and regulations in face recognition technology.超越监控:人脸识别技术中的隐私、伦理与监管
Front Big Data. 2024 Jul 3;7:1337465. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1337465. eCollection 2024.
7
Protection of the rights of the individual when using facial recognition technology.使用面部识别技术时对个人权利的保护。
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 11;8(3):e09086. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09086. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Using Facial Recognition Tools for Health Assessment.利用人脸识别工具进行健康评估。
Plast Surg Nurs. 2021;41(4):232-236. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000410.
9
Biased Face Recognition Technology Used by Government: A Problem for Liberal Democracy.政府使用的有偏见的人脸识别技术:自由民主的一个问题。
Philos Technol. 2021;34(4):1639-1663. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00478-z. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Biometric technology in "no-gate border crossing solutions" under consideration of privacy, ethical, regulatory and social acceptance.在考虑隐私、伦理、监管及社会接受度的情况下,“无闸口边境通关解决方案”中的生物识别技术。
Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;80(15):23665-23678. doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-10266-0. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A cryptosystem for face recognition based on optical interference and phase truncation theory.一种基于光学干涉和相位截断理论的人脸识别密码系统。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06990-y.
2
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning Approaches in Image Processing.图像处理中深度学习方法的全面综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;25(2):531. doi: 10.3390/s25020531.
3
Coordinate-wise monotonic transformations enable privacy-preserving age estimation with 3D face point cloud.坐标单调变换可实现 3D 人脸点云的隐私保护年龄估计。
Sci China Life Sci. 2024 Jul;67(7):1489-1501. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2518-8. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
4
A Critique of Automated Approaches to Code Facial Expressions: What Do Researchers Need to Know?对面部表情编码自动化方法的批判:研究人员需要了解什么?
Affect Sci. 2023 Jul 10;4(3):500-505. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00195-0. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Review on Facial-Recognition-Based Applications in Disease Diagnosis.基于面部识别的疾病诊断应用综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;9(7):273. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070273.
6
Reconsidering the regulation of facial recognition in public spaces.重新审视公共场所面部识别的监管。
AI Ethics. 2023;3(2):625-635. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00194-0. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Privacy-Preserved In-Cabin Monitoring System for Autonomous Vehicles.自动驾驶汽车隐私保护舱内监控系统。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 22;2022:5389359. doi: 10.1155/2022/5389359. eCollection 2022.
8
Digital twins and the ethics of health decision-making concerning children.数字孪生与儿童健康决策伦理
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Apr 8;3(4):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100469.
9
A principled approach to cross-sector genomic data access.跨部门基因组数据访问的原则方法。
Bioethics. 2021 Oct;35(8):779-786. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12919. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics, public health and technology responses to COVID-19.伦理、公共卫生与新冠疫情的技术应对措施
Bioethics. 2021 May;35(4):366-371. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12856. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.动态同意:21世纪研究网络的患者界面
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. Epub 2014 May 7.

生物识别面部识别技术的伦理应用。

The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology.

作者信息

Smith Marcus, Miller Seumas

机构信息

Centre for Law and Justice, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia.

Australian Graduate School of Policing and Security, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

AI Soc. 2022;37(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9
PMID:33867693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042627/
Abstract

Biometric facial recognition is an artificial intelligence technology involving the automated comparison of facial features, used by law enforcement to identify unknown suspects from photographs and closed circuit television. Its capability is expanding rapidly in association with artificial intelligence and has great potential to solve crime. However, it also carries significant privacy and other ethical implications that require law and regulation. This article examines the rise of biometric facial recognition, current applications and legal developments, and conducts an ethical analysis of the issues that arise. Ethical principles are applied to mediate the potential conflicts in relation to this information technology that arise between security, on the one hand, and individual privacy and autonomy, and democratic accountability, on the other. These can be used to support appropriate law and regulation for the technology as it continues to develop.

摘要

生物特征面部识别是一种人工智能技术,涉及对面部特征的自动比对,执法部门利用它从照片和闭路电视中识别身份不明的嫌疑人。随着人工智能的发展,其功能正在迅速扩展,在解决犯罪问题方面具有巨大潜力。然而,它也带来了重大的隐私及其他伦理问题,需要法律法规加以规范。本文考察了生物特征面部识别的兴起、当前应用及法律进展,并对所产生的问题进行伦理分析。运用伦理原则来调解信息技术在安全与个人隐私、自主权以及民主问责制之间可能产生的潜在冲突。随着该技术不断发展,这些原则可用于支持对其进行适当的法律法规规范。