• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民对互联网使用问题的咨询:六个国家的伦理考虑和实证见解。

Citizen Consultation on Problematic Usage of the Internet: Ethical Considerations and Empirical Insights From Six Countries.

机构信息

Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Macedonia.

Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;9:587459. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.587459. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.587459
PMID:33869124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8046911/
Abstract

Citizens and scientists can work together to improve the collective well-being, if citizens are inspired to help the advancement of science, and researchers motivated to listen to the voices of citizens. The benefits of such collaboration are increasingly recognized by both citizens and scientists, as reflected in the growing number of related publications and initiatives. This is especially relevant for emerging areas of research, where early involvement of citizens could help to envision, prioritize, and plan prospective studies. The Problematic Usage of the Internet (PUI) is one such area, which is fast becoming a public mental health concern. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the practical guidelines and ethical requirements for citizen involvement at the earliest stages of PUI. In our paper, we propose a conceptual framework and a template for initial involvement of citizens in PUI. They are derived from our community case studies, conducted in six European countries (Georgia, Greece, Malta, North Macedonia, Portugal, and Spain) and consisting of consultation with diverse groups of interested citizens (students, parents, teachers, and health professionals). Informed by our consultation exercises, we also highlight four ethical aspects for citizen involvement in the research on PUI or novel disciplines in general. They follow simple guiding principles to ensure that scientists will: enable a long-term commitment and inclusive opportunities for citizens, challenge established power hierarchies, and support collaboration, co-production and co-authorship with citizens. We believe that the proposed practical guidelines and ethical considerations, provide a valuable foundation on which to advance our understanding and generate international strategies for citizen involvement in PUI.

摘要

公民和科学家可以共同努力,提高集体福祉,如果公民受到激励去帮助科学进步,而研究人员也有动力去倾听公民的声音。这种合作的好处越来越被公民和科学家所认识,这反映在相关出版物和倡议的数量不断增加上。对于新兴的研究领域来说,这种合作尤其重要,因为公民的早期参与有助于设想、优先考虑和规划未来的研究。互联网不良用语(PUI)就是这样一个领域,它迅速成为公众关注的心理健康问题。然而,在 PUI 的早期阶段,公民参与的实际指导方针和道德要求仍然不够明确。在我们的论文中,我们提出了一个概念框架和一个公民初步参与 PUI 的模板。它们源自我们在六个欧洲国家(格鲁吉亚、希腊、马耳他、北马其顿、葡萄牙和西班牙)进行的社区案例研究,研究内容包括与不同利益相关的公民群体(学生、家长、教师和卫生专业人员)进行协商。根据我们的协商活动,我们还强调了公民参与 PUI 研究或一般新学科的四个伦理方面。它们遵循简单的指导原则,以确保科学家将:使公民能够长期承诺和获得包容性机会,挑战既定的权力等级制度,并支持与公民的合作、共同生产和共同创作。我们相信,所提出的实际指导方针和道德考虑为推进我们对公民参与 PUI 的理解并制定国际战略提供了有价值的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/242cbea24f64/fpubh-09-587459-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/67e681884bd0/fpubh-09-587459-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/9dc633a26322/fpubh-09-587459-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/25f282982e3e/fpubh-09-587459-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/4e21d0d69b58/fpubh-09-587459-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/242cbea24f64/fpubh-09-587459-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/67e681884bd0/fpubh-09-587459-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/9dc633a26322/fpubh-09-587459-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/25f282982e3e/fpubh-09-587459-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/4e21d0d69b58/fpubh-09-587459-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9437/8046911/242cbea24f64/fpubh-09-587459-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizen Consultation on Problematic Usage of the Internet: Ethical Considerations and Empirical Insights From Six Countries.公民对互联网使用问题的咨询:六个国家的伦理考虑和实证见解。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;9:587459. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.587459. eCollection 2021.
2
Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey.知情公民与赋权公民在健康方面:来自一项欧洲调查的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 16;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-20.
3
Advances in problematic usage of the internet research - A narrative review by experts from the European network for problematic usage of the internet.互联网问题使用研究进展——来自欧洲互联网问题使用网络专家的叙述性综述。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;118:152346. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152346. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement 'how to' guide for researchers.与患者和公众共同创作一份面向研究人员的“如何做”患者和公众参与指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 17;6:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00208-3. eCollection 2020.
5
Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain.共同创建本地环境流行病学研究:以西班牙巴塞罗那市开展公民科学研究空气污染及相关健康风险为例。
Environ Health. 2022 Jan 12;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8.
6
A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.一项关于衡量和评估公民参与健康研究的方法的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 10;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00405-2.
7
Manifesto for a European research network into Problematic Usage of the Internet.互联网使用问题研究的欧洲研究网络宣言
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Nov;28(11):1232-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP.对公民科学包容性参与的内在因素进行建模:CSI-COP 参与者调查分析的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294575. eCollection 2023.
9
Implementing co-created citizen science in five environmental epidemiological studies in the CitieS-Health project.在 CitieS-Health 项目的五个环境流行病学研究中实施共同创建的公民科学。
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 2):117469. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117469. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.护理领域的公民科学研究:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(2):946-960. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020072.
2
Problematic use of the Internet in low- and middle-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家在新冠疫情之前及期间互联网的问题使用情况:一项范围综述
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;48:101208. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101208. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3
Patient and Public Involvement in Youth Mental Health Research: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Practices and Impact.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review.欧洲各地对患者和公众参与的态度和方法:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):18-27. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13111. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
3
Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.
患者及公众参与青少年心理健康研究:实践与影响的系统评价方案
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 5;12:703624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703624. eCollection 2021.
4
Problematic use of the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic: Good practices and mental health recommendations.新冠疫情期间互联网的问题使用:良好实践和心理健康建议。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152279. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152279. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
预防 COVID-19 大流行期间的问题性互联网使用:共识指南。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;100:152180. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152180. Epub 2020 May 12.
4
Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.与患者合作参与医疗保健研究:伦理问题、挑战及实践建议的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 11;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0460-0.
5
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.面向研究人员、患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者的健康领域以患者为导向的研究能力(PORCH):一项范围综述的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 10;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0. eCollection 2020.
6
Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm.赌博与公共健康:我们需要政策行动来预防危害。
BMJ. 2019 May 8;365:l1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1807.
7
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
Manifesto for a European research network into Problematic Usage of the Internet.互联网使用问题研究的欧洲研究网络宣言
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Nov;28(11):1232-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Involving young people in cyberbullying research: The implementation and evaluation of a rights-based approach.让年轻人参与网络欺凌研究:基于权利的方法的实施和评估。
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/hex.12830. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Recommendations From a Delphi Panel.以患者为中心的结局研究的监督:德尔菲小组的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):559-563. doi: 10.7326/M18-1334. Epub 2018 Sep 25.