Camargo Garbin Livia, Lopez Catalina, Carmona Jorge U
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of the West Indies at St. Augustine, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Grupo de Investigación Terapia Regenerativa, Departamento de Salud Animal, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 31;8:641818. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.641818. eCollection 2021.
In the 1990s, the role of platelets in inflammation and tissue healing was finally recognized. Since then, the clinical use of platelet-derived products (hemocomponents), such as, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), markedly increased. The promise of a more economical option of a disease-modifying treatment led to the intensive and continuous research of PRP products and to its widespread clinical use. A number of protocols and commercial kits have been developed with the intention of creating a more practical and reliable option for clinical use in equine patients. Still, the direct comparison between studies is particularly challenging due to the lack of standardization on the preparation methods and product composition. The incomplete reports on PRP cellular concentration and the poorly designed studies are additional matters that contest the clinical efficiency of this biomaterial. To overcome such challenges, several and studies have been proposed. Specifically, experiments have greatly focused in protocol optimization and its effect in different tissues. Additionally, studies have proposed different biological products envisioning the upgrade of the anti-inflammatory cytokines trusting to increase its anti-inflammatory effect. The individual variability and health status of the animal, type of tissue and condition treated, and protocol implemented are known to influence on the product's cell and cytokine composition. Such variability is a main clinical concern once it can potentially influence on PRP's therapeutic effects. Thus, lack of qualitative and quantitative evidence-based data supporting PRP's clinical use persists, despite of the numerous studies intended to accomplish this purpose. This narrative review aims to critically evaluate the main research published in the past decade and how it can potentially impact the clinical use of PRP.
20世纪90年代,血小板在炎症和组织愈合中的作用终于得到认可。从那时起,血小板衍生产品(血液成分),如富血小板血浆(PRP)的临床应用显著增加。这种有望成为更经济的疾病改善治疗选择的产品促使人们对PRP产品进行了深入且持续的研究,并使其在临床上得到广泛应用。为了为马科动物患者的临床应用创造更实用、可靠的选择,人们开发了许多方案和商业试剂盒。然而,由于制备方法和产品成分缺乏标准化,不同研究之间的直接比较尤其具有挑战性。关于PRP细胞浓度的报告不完整以及研究设计不佳,也是质疑这种生物材料临床疗效的其他问题。为了克服这些挑战,人们提出了一些研究。具体而言,实验主要集中在方案优化及其在不同组织中的效果。此外,一些研究还提出了不同的生物产品,期望通过提升抗炎细胞因子来增强其抗炎效果。已知动物的个体差异和健康状况、治疗的组织类型和病情以及所实施的方案会影响产品的细胞和细胞因子组成。这种变异性是一个主要的临床问题,因为它可能会对PRP的治疗效果产生潜在影响。因此,尽管有许多旨在实现这一目的的研究,但仍然缺乏支持PRP临床应用的定性和定量循证数据。本叙述性综述旨在批判性地评估过去十年发表的主要研究及其对PRP临床应用可能产生的影响。