Kahancová Marta, Meszmann Tibor T, Sedláková Mária
Central European Labour Studies Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Front Sociol. 2020 Feb 26;5:3. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00003. eCollection 2020.
The concept of precarity is increasingly used for an analysis of standard and non-standard (atypical) employment forms-yet among atypical employment forms, platform-driven work is rarely included. This paper aims to fill this gap and provide a refined analytical framework for an evaluation of precarity in employment arrangements applicable to on-demand platform work. The legitimacy of such an analytical framework is two-fold. First, it allows identifying the dimensions of precarity in on-demand platform work. Second, it extends the understanding of how a general situation in the labor market connects to work precarity in on-demand platform work. The analytical framework is applied to evidence from two countries in Central and Eastern Europe-Hungary and Slovakia, where the rise of precarious employment went hand in hand with the rise of work via digital platforms. The central claim of the paper is that precarity in on-demand platform work is especially manifest in the dimensions of autonomy at work and of interest representation. Furthermore, digitalization enforces precarity, while at the same time, it mitigates labor market segmentation between standard and non-standard workers as distinct groups of workers.
“不稳定”这一概念越来越多地被用于分析标准和非标准(非典型)就业形式,然而在非典型就业形式中,平台驱动型工作却很少被纳入其中。本文旨在填补这一空白,并提供一个完善的分析框架,用于评估适用于按需平台工作的就业安排中的不稳定状况。这样一个分析框架的合理性体现在两个方面。其一,它能够识别按需平台工作中不稳定状况的各个维度。其二,它拓展了对于劳动力市场总体状况如何与按需平台工作中的工作不稳定相联系的理解。该分析框架被应用于来自中欧和东欧两个国家——匈牙利和斯洛伐克的证据,在这两个国家,不稳定就业的兴起与通过数字平台开展的工作的兴起相伴而生。本文的核心观点是,按需平台工作中的不稳定状况在工作自主性和利益代表这两个维度上尤为明显。此外,数字化加剧了不稳定状况,与此同时,它又减轻了标准工人和非标准工人这两类不同工人群体之间的劳动力市场分割。