Fawcett H D, Hayden C K, Adams J C, Swischuk L E
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Pediatr Radiol. 1988;18(4):311-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02388999.
It has been suggested that gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy (GRS) might be useful in assisting one in determining therapy for patients suspected of aspirating or becoming apneic secondary to gastroesophageal reflux. This, however, has not been our experience and in reviewing 23 patients with recurrent pneumonia and/or apnea who had GRS, we were able to detect aspiration in only one. This was especially significant since 13 (59%) of these patients had demonstrable reflux, and of these, eight were treated successfully for suspected aspiration even though none was demonstrated isotopically. To be sure, the demonstration of pulmonary aspiration with GRS had little influence on patient selection and response to therapy. For this reason we feel there is little justification in depending on the GRS for the specific purpose of trying to document pulmonary aspiration in infants and children who are refluxing.
有人提出,胃食管反流闪烁显像(GRS)可能有助于辅助确定对怀疑因胃食管反流而出现误吸或呼吸暂停的患者的治疗方案。然而,我们并没有这样的经验。在回顾23例接受GRS检查的复发性肺炎和/或呼吸暂停患者时,我们仅在1例中检测到误吸。这一点尤为重要,因为这些患者中有13例(59%)存在明显的反流,其中8例因怀疑误吸而接受了成功治疗,尽管同位素检查未显示有误吸。诚然,GRS显示的肺部误吸对患者的选择和治疗反应影响很小。因此,我们认为,对于试图记录反流的婴幼儿和儿童的肺部误吸这一特定目的,依靠GRS几乎没有道理。