Suppr超能文献

[紧急医疗服务、医疗值班服务还是急诊科:德国人在急性医疗事件中不确定该联系谁]

[Emergency medical service, medical on-call service, or emergency department : Germans unsure whom to contact in acute medical events].

作者信息

Metelmann Bibiana, Brinkrolf Peter, Kliche Marian, Vollmer Marcus, Hahnenkamp Klaus, Metelmann Camilla

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Anästhesie, Intensiv‑, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland.

Institut für Bioinformatik, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.

出版信息

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Mar;117(2):144-151. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00820-5. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In medical events, patients have to independently decide whom to contact: emergency medical services, medical on-call service or emergency department.

OBJECTIVES

Are Germans able to assess the urgency of medical events and choose the correct resource?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2018 a nationwide anonymous telephone survey was done in Gabler-Haeder design. In all, 708 interviewees were presented with six medical scenarios. Participants were asked to rate urgency and to assess whether medical help was necessary within minutes to hours. Telephone numbers of emergency medical services and medical on-call service were inquired.

RESULTS

Urgency of different scenarios was often misjudged: in cases with high, medium, and low urgency the misjudgement rate were 20, 50, and 27%, respectively. If medical help was rated as necessary, some participants chose the wrong service: 25% would not call an ambulance in stroke or myocardial infarction. In cases with medium urgency, more respondents chose to consult an emergency department (38%) than to call medical on-call service (46%).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge regarding different options for treatment of medical events and competence to assess urgency seem to be too low. Beside efforts to increase health literacy, one solution might be to introduce a joint telephone number for emergency medical services and medical on-call service with a uniform assessment tool and appropriate allocation.

摘要

背景

在医疗事件中,患者必须独立决定联系谁:紧急医疗服务机构、医疗值班服务或急诊科。

目的

德国人是否能够评估医疗事件的紧迫性并选择正确的资源?

材料与方法

2018年,采用加布勒 - 黑德设计进行了一项全国性匿名电话调查。总共向708名受访者展示了六种医疗场景。要求参与者对紧迫性进行评分,并评估在数分钟至数小时内是否需要医疗帮助。询问了紧急医疗服务机构和医疗值班服务的电话号码。

结果

不同场景的紧迫性经常被误判:在高、中、低紧迫性情况下,误判率分别为20%、50%和27%。如果认为需要医疗帮助,一些参与者选择了错误的服务:25%的人在中风或心肌梗死时不会呼叫救护车。在中等紧迫性的情况下,更多受访者选择去急诊科就诊(38%),而不是呼叫医疗值班服务(46%)。

结论

关于医疗事件不同治疗选择的知识以及评估紧迫性的能力似乎太低。除了努力提高健康素养外,一种解决方案可能是为紧急医疗服务机构和医疗值班服务引入一个联合电话号码,并配备统一的评估工具和适当的分配机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f1/8897349/b314094f6254/63_2021_820_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验