• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前指数:一种用于创伤受害者现场分诊的评分系统。

Prehospital Index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims.

作者信息

Koehler J J, Baer L J, Malafa S A, Meindertsma M S, Navitskas N R, Huizenga J E

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Feb;15(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80016-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80016-6
PMID:3946860
Abstract

The Prehospital Index (PHI) is a triage-oriented trauma severity scoring system comprising four components: systolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory status, and level of consciousness, each scored 0 to 5. The PHI was developed after analysis of 313 cases to provide an objective prehospital scoring system for distinguishing less seriously injured patients (minor trauma) from those patients who are likely to die within 72 hours after injury or who require general or neurosurgical operative intervention within 24 hours (major trauma). A PHI of 0 to 3 indicated minor trauma, and a PHI of 4 to 20 signified major trauma. Retrospective analysis of an additional 465 consecutive trauma cases revealed that patients with a PHI of 0 to 3 (minor trauma) had a 0% mortality and a 2% rate of general or neurosurgical operative intervention. Those with a PHI of 4 to 20 (major trauma) carried a 16.4% mortality and an emergency operative rate of 49.1%. The PHI was applied prospectively to 388 consecutive trauma cases presenting to the Butterworth Hospital Emergency Department from October through December 1984. Of the 351 patients scored as minor trauma in the field, there was a 0% mortality and only a 0.3% operative rate. Those scored as major trauma in the field had a mortality of 27% (PHI 4 to 7, 0%; PHI 8 to 20, 53%) and an operative rate of 40.5% (PHI 4 to 7, 22%; PHI 8 to 20, 57.9%). These data demonstrate the ability of the PHI to predict mortality (P less than .001) and the need for emergency general or neurosurgical operative intervention (P less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

院前指数(PHI)是一种以分诊为导向的创伤严重程度评分系统,由四个部分组成:收缩压、脉搏、呼吸状态和意识水平,每个部分的评分范围为0至5分。PHI是在对313例病例进行分析后制定的,旨在提供一种客观的院前评分系统,以区分伤势较轻的患者(轻度创伤)与那些受伤后72小时内可能死亡或需要在24小时内进行普通外科或神经外科手术干预的患者(重度创伤)。PHI为0至3分表示轻度创伤,4至20分表示重度创伤。对另外465例连续创伤病例的回顾性分析显示,PHI为0至3分(轻度创伤)的患者死亡率为0%,普通外科或神经外科手术干预率为2%。PHI为4至20分(重度创伤)的患者死亡率为16.4%,急诊手术率为49.1%。1984年10月至12月期间,PHI被前瞻性地应用于连续388例前往巴特沃思医院急诊科的创伤病例。在现场被评为轻度创伤的351例患者中,死亡率为0%,手术率仅为0.3%。在现场被评为重度创伤的患者死亡率为27%(PHI 4至7分,0%;PHI 8至20分,53%),手术率为40.5%(PHI 4至7分,22%;PHI 8至20分,57.9%)。这些数据证明了PHI预测死亡率(P小于0.001)和急诊普通外科或神经外科手术干预需求(P小于0.001)的能力。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Prehospital Index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims.院前指数:一种用于创伤受害者现场分诊的评分系统。
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Feb;15(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80016-6.
2
A multicenter validation of the prehospital index.院前指数的多中心验证
Ann Emerg Med. 1987 Apr;16(4):380-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80354-2.
3
Limitations of the prehospital index in identifying patients in need of a major trauma center.院前指数在识别需要大型创伤中心治疗的患者方面的局限性。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Aug;26(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70142-7.
4
Field trauma triage: combining mechanism of injury with the prehospital index for an improved trauma triage tool.现场创伤分诊:将损伤机制与院前指数相结合以改进创伤分诊工具。
J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):283-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00013.
5
Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压(MGAP):一种新的简单的创伤前分诊评分,可预测创伤患者的死亡率。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):831-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4a67.
6
Evaluation of the Prehospital Index, presence of high-velocity impact and judgment of emergency medical technicians as criteria for trauma triage.院前指数评估、高速撞击存在情况以及急救医疗技术员判断作为创伤分诊标准。
CJEM. 2010 Mar;12(2):111-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012136.
7
Heart rate variability as a triage tool in patients with trauma during prehospital helicopter transport.院前直升机转运期间,心率变异性作为创伤患者的分诊工具。
J Trauma. 2009 Sep;67(3):436-40. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ad67de.
8
Pediatric trauma triage: A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee systematic review.儿科创伤分诊:儿科创伤学会研究委员会系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):623-630. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002713.
9
Utilization Criteria for Prehospital Ultrasound in a Canadian Critical Care Helicopter Emergency Medical Service: Determining Who Might Benefit.加拿大重症监护直升机紧急医疗服务中院前超声的使用标准:确定谁可能从中受益。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Oct;32(5):536-540. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1700646X. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Trauma triage--a comparison of the trauma score and the vital signs score.创伤分诊——创伤评分与生命体征评分的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1986 Mar;56(3):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1986.tb06134.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of risk prediction model for adverse outcomes in trauma patients.创伤患者不良结局风险预测模型的建立与验证。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2391018. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2391018. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study.比较九种创伤评分系统在预测儿科创伤患者住院结局中的作用:一项多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4.
3
Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Emergency Trauma Surgery Patients Who Require Urgent Care During the Pandemic: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.
胸部计算机断层扫描在大流行期间需要紧急护理的急诊创伤手术患者中诊断COVID-19:一项伞状综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 6;10(5):e25207. doi: 10.2196/25207.
4
Trauma models to identify major trauma and mortality in the prehospital setting.创伤模型在院前环境中识别重大创伤和死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):373-380. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11304. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Profile of trauma mortality and trauma care resources at rural emergency departments and urban trauma centres in Quebec: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.魁北克农村急救部门和城市创伤中心创伤死亡率和创伤救治资源概况:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 2;9(6):e028512. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028512.
6
Performance of injury severity measures in trauma research: a literature review and validation analysis of studies from low-income and middle-income countries.创伤研究中损伤严重程度测量的性能:来自低收入和中等收入国家的研究的文献回顾和验证分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):e023161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023161.
7
Prehospital Index provides prognosis for hospitalized patients with acute trauma.院前指数可为急性创伤住院患者提供预后评估。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Apr 13;12:561-565. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154670. eCollection 2018.
8
Vasopressor use following traumatic injury - A single center retrospective study.创伤性损伤后血管加压药的使用——一项单中心回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0176587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176587. eCollection 2017.
9
Validation of a novel prediction model for early mortality in adult trauma patients in three public university hospitals in urban India.印度城市地区三家公立大学医院成年创伤患者早期死亡率新型预测模型的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 22;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0079-0.
10
Refining the trauma triage algorithm at an Australian major trauma centre: derivation and internal validation of a triage risk score.在澳大利亚一家主要创伤中心优化创伤分诊算法:分诊风险评分的推导与内部验证
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Feb;40(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0315-1. Epub 2013 Jul 31.