Suppr超能文献

成年人公共卫生监测中肌肉强化锻炼的评估:系统评价。

Assessment of muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance for adults: A systematic review.

机构信息

Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, 37 Sinnathamby Boulevard, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.

Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, 37 Sinnathamby Boulevard, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia; Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106566. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106566. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

Abstract

There is strong scientific evidence that muscle-strengthening exercise (i.e. use of weight machines, push-ups, sit-ups) is independently associated with a reduced risk of multiple chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease). However, prevalence rates for meeting the muscle-strengthening exercise guideline (≥2 times/week) are significantly lower (20%) than those reported to meet the aerobic physical activity guideline (e.g. walking, jogging, cycling) (50%). It is therefore important to understand public health surveillance approaches to assess muscle-strengthening exercise. The aim of this review was to describe muscle-strengthening exercise assessment in public health surveillance. Informed by the PRISMA guidelines, an extensive keyword search was undertaken across 7 electronic data bases. We identified 86,672 possible articles and following screening (n = 1140 in full-text) against specific inclusion criteria (adults aged ≥18 years, English, studies containing <1000 participants), extracted data from 156 manuscripts. Fifty-eight different survey systems were identified across 17 countries. Muscle-strengthening exercise frequency (85.3%), duration (23.7%) and intensity (1.3%) were recorded. Muscle-strengthening exercise questions varied significantly, with some (11.5%) requiring a singular 'yes' vs 'no' response, while others (7.7%) sought specific details (e.g. muscle groups targeted). Assessments of duration and intensity were inconsistent. Very few studies measured the validity (0.6%) and reliability (1.3%) of muscle-strengthening exercise questions. Discrepancy exists within the current assessment systems/surveys used to assess muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance. This is likely to impede efforts to identify at risk groups and trends within physical activity surveillance, and to accurately assess associations between muscle-strengthening exercise and health-related outcomes.

摘要

有强有力的科学证据表明,增强肌肉力量的运动(例如使用举重器械、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐)与多种慢性疾病(如糖尿病、高血压、心血管疾病)的风险降低独立相关。然而,符合肌肉力量锻炼指导方针(每周≥2 次)的流行率明显较低(约 20%),而符合有氧运动指导方针(如散步、慢跑、骑自行车)的流行率则较高(约 50%)。因此,了解评估肌肉力量锻炼的公共卫生监测方法非常重要。本综述的目的是描述公共卫生监测中的肌肉力量锻炼评估。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在 7 个电子数据库中进行了广泛的关键词搜索。我们共确定了 86672 篇可能的文章,并在经过筛选(全文阅读 1140 篇)符合具体纳入标准(年龄≥18 岁的成年人、英语、包含<1000 名参与者的研究)后,从 156 篇论文中提取数据。在 17 个国家中确定了 58 种不同的调查系统。记录了肌肉力量锻炼的频率(85.3%)、持续时间(23.7%)和强度(1.3%)。肌肉力量锻炼问题差异很大,有些(11.5%)需要单一的“是”或“否”的回答,而其他问题(7.7%)则需要具体的细节(例如,针对的肌肉群)。对持续时间和强度的评估不一致。很少有研究评估肌肉力量锻炼问题的有效性(0.6%)和可靠性(1.3%)。当前用于公共卫生监测中评估肌肉力量锻炼的评估系统/调查存在差异。这可能会阻碍在体力活动监测中识别高风险人群和趋势的努力,也无法准确评估肌肉力量锻炼与健康相关结果之间的关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验