Suppr超能文献

抗阻训练与全因死亡率之间的关联:1999 - 2006年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)

Associations Between Resistance Training and All-Cause Mortality: NHANES 1999-2006.

作者信息

Booker Robert, Wong Mandy, Boyer William, Gorzelitz Jessica, Carnethon Mercedes R, Alexandria Shaina J

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Apr 23:15598276241248107. doi: 10.1177/15598276241248107.

Abstract

The 2nd recommends ≥2 days of resistance training (RT). Evidence supports a dose-response relation between RT volume and cardiometabolic health. We examined whether RT guidelines and volume were associated with lower all-cause mortality. Participants from the 1999-2006 NHANES cycles (N = 5855) self-reported the past 30 days of physical activity including the number of sessions, average session duration in minutes, and activity type. Mortality was ascertained from the linked National Death Index through the end of 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for all-cause mortality by RT Guideline adherence and per 1000 MET-minutes of monthly RT volume. Approximately 1-in-10 participants met the RT Guidelines (n = 612, 11.6%). The mean monthly RT volume was 2033.3 ± 2487.7 MET-minutes. Mortality incidence was 10.6% (n = 886). Neither meeting the Guidelines (HR [95% CI]; 1.02 [.74, 1.41], compared to not meeting the Guidelines) nor monthly RT volume per 1000 MET-minutes (1.02 [.92, 1.14]) was associated with all-cause mortality in adjusted models, with no evidence of effect modification by sex or age. The present study did not find an association between RT and all-cause mortality. These results do not support the RT canon, warranting further investigation.

摘要

第二项建议进行≥2天的抗阻训练(RT)。有证据支持抗阻训练量与心脏代谢健康之间存在剂量反应关系。我们研究了抗阻训练指南和训练量是否与较低的全因死亡率相关。来自1999 - 2006年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)周期的参与者(N = 5855)自我报告了过去30天的身体活动情况,包括训练次数、每次训练的平均时长(以分钟为单位)以及活动类型。通过与国家死亡指数相链接,确定截至2019年底的死亡率。使用Cox比例风险回归来估计遵循抗阻训练指南和每月每1000代谢当量 - 分钟的抗阻训练量对应的全因死亡率风险比。大约十分之一的参与者符合抗阻训练指南(n = 612,11.6%)。每月抗阻训练量的平均值为2033.3 ± 2487.7代谢当量 - 分钟。死亡率为10.6%(n = 886)。在调整模型中,无论是遵循指南(风险比[95%置信区间];1.02 [0.74, 1.41],与未遵循指南相比)还是每月每1000代谢当量 - 分钟的抗阻训练量(1.02 [0.92, 1.14])均与全因死亡率无关,且没有证据表明性别或年龄存在效应修饰作用。本研究未发现抗阻训练与全因死亡率之间存在关联。这些结果不支持抗阻训练准则,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Associations Between Resistance Training and All-Cause Mortality: NHANES 1999-2006.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Apr 23:15598276241248107. doi: 10.1177/15598276241248107.
4
Association of Physical Activity Intensity With Mortality: A National Cohort Study of 403 681 US Adults.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):203-211. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6331.
8
Combined association of aerobic and muscle strengthening activity with mortality in individuals with hypertension.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Nov;47(11):3056-3067. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01788-3. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Benefits of Physical Activity and Exercise.
Circ Res. 2025 Jul 7;137(2):120-138. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.325526. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Association of Muscle-Strengthening and Aerobic Physical Activity With Mortality in US Adults Aged 65 Years or Older.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236778. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36778.
6
Exercising for Insulin Sensitivity - Is There a Mechanistic Relationship With Quantitative Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass?
Front Physiol. 2021 May 12;12:656909. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.656909. eCollection 2021.
7
Assessment of muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance for adults: A systematic review.
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106566. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106566. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
8
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
9
Muscle-strengthening Exercise Epidemiology: a New Frontier in Chronic Disease Prevention.
Sports Med Open. 2020 Aug 26;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00271-w.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验