• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算新冠疫情后南非拟议的基础设施刺激计划带来的就业增长

Estimating Employment Gains of the Proposed Infrastructure Stimulus Plan in Post-Covid-19 South Africa.

作者信息

Habiyaremye Alexis, Molewa Olebogeng, Lekomanyane Pelontle

机构信息

Human Sciences Research Council, Merchant House, 116-118 Buitengracht Street, Cape Town, 8001 South Africa.

出版信息

Eur J Dev Res. 2022;34(1):540-567. doi: 10.1057/s41287-021-00400-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1057/s41287-021-00400-5
PMID:33879979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8050995/
Abstract

For the economic recovery in the wake of Covid-19 pandemic, South Africa announced the launch of an ambitious ZAR 2.3 trillion infrastructure investment plan. This paper uses a simplified yet reliable method to analyse the potential growth and employment effects of this stimulus plan. Based on lower and upper bound values of the country's estimated fiscal multipliers, we built a scenario prediction template with which output and employment expansion can be analysed within specified constraints on the fiscal space and the country's economic dynamics. Our estimation model suggests that with a 50% state participation in the recovery investment, the best case scenario of fiscal stimulation would enable the economy to create 2.23 million jobs over the first 5 years of the stimulus investments (of which 1.74 million would be attributed to the stimulus effect), while the more realistic scenario based of the lower bound value of the fiscal multiplier with only 30% state participation predicts the creation of 1.67 million additional jobs, of which 1.18 million would be attributable to the stimulus. Our analysis also suggests that investing in the types of infrastructure that shift the production technology could change the long-term growth trajectory, while focusing on employment-intensive investment may only generate temporary effects.

摘要

为实现新冠疫情后的经济复苏,南非宣布启动一项规模达2.3万亿兰特的雄心勃勃的基础设施投资计划。本文采用一种简化但可靠的方法来分析该刺激计划的潜在增长和就业效应。基于该国估计财政乘数的下限和上限值,我们构建了一个情景预测模板,利用该模板可以在财政空间和国家经济动态的特定约束范围内分析产出和就业扩张情况。我们的估计模型表明,若国家在复苏投资中参与度为50%,财政刺激的最佳情景将使经济在刺激投资的头5年创造223万个就业岗位(其中174万个将归因于刺激效应),而基于财政乘数下限值且国家参与度仅为30%的更现实情景预测将创造167万个额外就业岗位,其中118万个可归因于刺激措施。我们的分析还表明,投资于能够改变生产技术的基础设施类型可能会改变长期增长轨迹,而专注于就业密集型投资可能只会产生短期效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/1ec4f534b6fc/41287_2021_400_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/e1b15ecdf646/41287_2021_400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/6071da53f3da/41287_2021_400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/ec47d6657ea1/41287_2021_400_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/659429fe19cf/41287_2021_400_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/ffaed3145c9e/41287_2021_400_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/321361ae16aa/41287_2021_400_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/986246d651cb/41287_2021_400_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/2dfa07b17fc8/41287_2021_400_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/1ec4f534b6fc/41287_2021_400_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/e1b15ecdf646/41287_2021_400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/6071da53f3da/41287_2021_400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/ec47d6657ea1/41287_2021_400_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/659429fe19cf/41287_2021_400_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/ffaed3145c9e/41287_2021_400_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/321361ae16aa/41287_2021_400_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/986246d651cb/41287_2021_400_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/2dfa07b17fc8/41287_2021_400_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ad/8050995/1ec4f534b6fc/41287_2021_400_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating Employment Gains of the Proposed Infrastructure Stimulus Plan in Post-Covid-19 South Africa.估算新冠疫情后南非拟议的基础设施刺激计划带来的就业增长
Eur J Dev Res. 2022;34(1):540-567. doi: 10.1057/s41287-021-00400-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
The perceived effectiveness and hidden inequity of postpandemic fiscal stimuli.大流行后财政刺激措施的感知效果和潜在不公平性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2105006119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105006119. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
[The impact of a full implementation of the Action Plan on Dependency 2021-2023 on the Spanish economy].《2021 - 2023年应对依赖行动计划的全面实施对西班牙经济的影响》
Gac Sanit. 2023 Feb 21;37:102289. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102289. eCollection 2023.
4
Fiscal sustainability in Africa: Accelerating the post-COVID-19 recovery through improved public finances.非洲的财政可持续性:通过改善公共财政加速新冠疫情后的复苏。
Afr Dev Rev. 2022 Jun;34(Suppl 1):S8-S33. doi: 10.1111/1467-8268.12648. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Simulating employment and fiscal effects of public investment in high-quality universal childcare in the UK.模拟英国高质量普及型儿童保育公共投资的就业和财政影响。
Int J Child Care Educ Policy. 2022;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40723-022-00096-y. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
Hysteresis and fiscal stimulus in a recession.衰退中的滞后效应与财政刺激
J Int Money Finance. 2022 Jun;124:102614. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102614. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Macroeconomic impacts of cigarette consumption in Pakistan.巴基斯坦香烟消费的宏观经济影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s337-s343. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055257. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
8
Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?卫生部门的投资是促进还是抑制了经济增长?
Global Health. 2013 Sep 23;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-43.
9
An NIH investment in health equity - the economic impact of the Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions.美国国立卫生研究院在健康公平方面的投资 - 弗林特健康公平解决方案中心的经济影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;21(1):1774. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11795-5.
10
Policy instruments facilitate China's COVID-19 work resumption.政策工具助力中国复工复产。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2305692120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305692120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.