Core Facilities Coordinator, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Mass Spectrometry Core Manager, Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
J Biomol Tech. 2021 Apr;32(1):1-9. doi: 10.7171/jbt.21-3201-002.
Core facilities (CFs) provide a centralised access to costly equipment, scientific expertise, experimental design, day-to-day technical support and training of users. CFs have a tremendous impact on research outputs, skills and educational agendas, increasing the competencies of staff, researchers and students. However, the rapid development of new technologies and methodologies for the life sciences requires fast adaptation and development of existing core facilities and their technical and scientific staff. Given the scarcity of well-defined CF career paths, CF staff positions are typically filled by people having followed either academic or technical tracks. Each academic institution follows different policies and often fails to adequately recognize the merits of CF personnel and to support their training efficiently. Thus, the Core Technologies for Life Science association (CTLS), through the Training working group, has conducted an anonymous online survey to assess the training needs of CF personnel, as well as to identify common characteristics and challenges in this relatively new and dynamic career type. 275 individuals, including core managers and directors, technicians, technologists and administrators, participated in the survey. The survey was divided into 2 sections; the first, applied to all respondents, and the second, specifically targeted core management issues. Training needs in technological areas, financial and soft skills, management and administrative issues were surveyed as well. The lack of clarity and consistency regarding established career paths for CF professionals was evident from the second part of the survey, highlighting geographical or cultural differences. Gender balance was achieved and the distribution was always taken into account. The results of this survey highlight a need to develop better training resources for CF staff, to improve their recognition within academic institutions, and to establish a recognized career pathway.
核心设施(CFs)为昂贵的设备、科学专业知识、实验设计、日常技术支持和用户培训提供了集中访问途径。CFs 对研究成果、技能和教育议程产生了巨大影响,提高了员工、研究人员和学生的能力。然而,生命科学新技术和方法的快速发展要求对现有核心设施及其技术和科学人员进行快速适应和发展。鉴于明确的 CF 职业道路稀缺,CF 工作人员的职位通常由遵循学术或技术轨道的人员填补。每个学术机构都遵循不同的政策,并且往往不能充分认识到 CF 人员的优点,并有效地支持他们的培训。因此,核心技术生命科学协会(CTLS)通过培训工作组进行了一项匿名在线调查,以评估 CF 人员的培训需求,并确定这种相对较新且充满活力的职业类型的共同特点和挑战。275 人,包括核心经理和主任、技术人员、技术专家和管理人员,参加了这项调查。该调查分为两部分;第一部分适用于所有受访者,第二部分专门针对核心管理问题。还调查了技术领域、财务和软技能、管理和行政问题方面的培训需求。CF 专业人员的既定职业道路缺乏明确性和一致性,这一点从调查的第二部分明显看出,突出了地域或文化差异。实现了性别平衡,并且始终考虑到分配情况。这项调查的结果强调需要为 CF 工作人员开发更好的培训资源,提高他们在学术机构中的认可度,并建立公认的职业道路。