Suppr超能文献

考察迷你临床演练评估的教育影响:一项随机对照研究。

Examining the educational impact of the mini-CEX: a randomised controlled study.

作者信息

Martinsen Susanne Skjervold Smeby, Espeland Torvald, Berg Erik Andreas Rye, Samstad Eivind, Lillebo Børge, Slørdahl Tobias S

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02670-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) as a formative assessment tool among undergraduate medical students, in terms of student perceptions, effects on direct observation and feedback, and educational impact.

METHODS

Cluster randomised study of 38 fifth-year medical students during a 16-week clinical placement. Hospitals were randomised to provide a minimum of 8 mini-CEXs per student (intervention arm) or continue with ad-hoc feedback (control arm). After finishing their clinical placement, students completed an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), a written test and a survey.

RESULTS

All participants in the intervention group completed the pre-planned number of assessments, and 60% found them to be useful during their clinical placement. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in reported quantity or quality of direct observation and feedback. Observed mean scores were marginally higher on the OSCE and written test in the intervention group, but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable potential in assessing medical students during clinical placements and routine practice, but the educational impact of formative assessments remains mostly unknown. This study contributes with a robust study design, and may serve as a basis for future research.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从学生认知、对直接观察和反馈的影响以及教育影响方面,评估微型临床评估演练(mini-CEX)作为本科医学生形成性评估工具的效果。

方法

对38名五年级医学生在为期16周的临床实习期间进行整群随机研究。医院被随机分为为每名学生至少提供8次mini-CEX(干预组)或继续进行临时反馈(对照组)。临床实习结束后,学生完成客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)、笔试和一项调查。

结果

干预组的所有参与者都完成了预先计划的评估次数,60%的人认为这些评估在他们的临床实习期间有用。总体而言,两组在报告的直接观察和反馈的数量或质量上没有统计学上的显著差异。干预组在OSCE和笔试中的观察平均分数略高,但无统计学意义。

结论

在临床实习和常规实践中评估医学生有很大潜力,但形成性评估的教育影响大多仍不明确。本研究提供了一个严谨的研究设计,可作为未来研究的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3c/8061047/d0c87f00e472/12909_2021_2670_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验