Singh Laura, Kanstrup Marie, Depa Katherine, Falk Ann-Charlotte, Lindström Veronica, Dahl Oili, Göransson Katarina E, Rudman Ann, Holmes Emily A
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, Uppsala, Sweden.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 26;5(5):e27473. doi: 10.2196/27473.
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the worldwide need for simple remotely delivered (digital) scalable interventions that can also be used preventatively to protect the mental health of health care staff exposed to psychologically traumatic events during their COVID-19-related work. We have developed a brief behavioral intervention that aims to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events but has only been delivered face-to-face so far. After digitalizing the intervention materials, the intervention was delivered digitally to target users (health care staff) for the first time. The adaption for staff's working context in a hospital setting used a co-design approach.
The aims of this mixed method exploratory pilot study with health care staff who experienced working in the pandemic were to pilot the intervention that we have digitalized (for remote delivery and with remote support) and adapted for this target population (health care staff working clinically during a pandemic) to explore its ability to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events and improve related symptoms (eg, posttraumatic stress) and participant's perception of their functioning, and to explore the feasibility and acceptability of both the digitalized intervention and digitalized data collection.
We worked closely with target users with lived experience of working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital context (registered nurses who experienced intrusive memories from traumatic events at work; N=3). We used a mixed method design and exploratory quantitative and qualitative analysis.
After completing the digitalized intervention once with remote researcher support (approximately 25 minutes) and a brief follow-up check-in, participants learned to use the intervention independently. All 3 participants reported zero intrusive memories during week 5 (primary outcome: 100% digital data capture). Prior to study inclusion, two or more intrusions in the week were reported preintervention (assessed retrospectively). There was a general pattern of symptom reduction and improvement in perceived functioning (eg, concentration) at follow-up. The digitalized intervention and data collection were perceived as feasible and rated as acceptable (eg, all 3 participants would recommend it to a colleague). Participants were positive toward the digital intervention as a useful tool that could readily be incorporated into work life and repeated in the face of ongoing or repeated trauma exposure.
The intervention when delivered remotely and adapted for this population during the pandemic was well received by participants. Since it could be tailored around work and daily life and used preventatively, the intervention may hold promise for health care staff pending future evaluations of efficacy. Limitations include the small sample size, lack of daily intrusion frequency data in the week before the intervention, and lack of a control condition. Following this co-design process in adapting and improving intervention delivery and evaluation, the next step is to investigate the efficacy of the digitalized intervention in a randomized controlled trial.
新冠疫情加速了全球对简单的远程交付(数字化)可扩展干预措施的需求,这些措施还可用于预防性地保护在新冠相关工作中暴露于心理创伤事件的医护人员的心理健康。我们开发了一种简短的行为干预措施,旨在减少创伤事件侵入性记忆的数量,但到目前为止仅以面对面的方式进行交付。在将干预材料数字化后,首次将该干预措施以数字化方式交付给目标用户(医护人员)。针对医院环境中工作人员的工作环境进行的调整采用了共同设计的方法。
本项针对在疫情期间有工作经历的医护人员的混合方法探索性试点研究的目的是,对我们已数字化(用于远程交付和远程支持)并针对该目标人群(在疫情期间临床工作的医护人员)进行调整的干预措施进行试点,以探索其减少创伤事件侵入性记忆数量、改善相关症状(如创伤后应激)以及参与者对其功能的认知的能力,并探索数字化干预措施和数字化数据收集的可行性和可接受性。
我们与在医院环境中具有新冠疫情期间临床工作实际经验的目标用户(经历过工作中创伤事件侵入性记忆的注册护士;N = 3)密切合作。我们采用了混合方法设计以及探索性定量和定性分析。
在远程研究人员的支持下(约25分钟)完成一次数字化干预以及一次简短的随访检查后,参与者学会了独立使用该干预措施。所有3名参与者均报告在第5周时侵入性记忆为零(主要结果:100%数字化数据捕获)。在纳入研究之前,干预前回顾性评估显示,参与者每周有两次或更多次侵入性记忆。随访时总体上有症状减轻和感知功能(如注意力)改善的趋势。数字化干预措施和数据收集被认为是可行的,且被评为可接受(如所有3名参与者都会向同事推荐)。参与者对数字化干预措施持积极态度,认为它是一种有用的工具,可以很容易地融入工作生活,并在面对持续或反复的创伤暴露时重复使用。
在疫情期间远程交付并针对该人群进行调整的干预措施受到了参与者的好评。由于它可以围绕工作和日常生活进行定制并用于预防,该干预措施在未来进行疗效评估之前,可能对医护人员具有前景。局限性包括样本量小、干预前一周缺乏每日侵入频率数据以及缺乏对照条件。在遵循这个共同设计过程来调整和改进干预措施的交付及评估之后,下一步是在随机对照试验中研究数字化干预措施的疗效。