Suppr超能文献

根据表面活性剂成分,比较 HET-CAM 方案和产品使用临床研究评估个人护理产品(包括化妆品)的眼部刺激性。

Comparison between HET-CAM protocols and a product use clinical study for eye irritation evaluation of personal care products including cosmetics according to their surfactant composition.

机构信息

Instituto de Farmacología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Instituto de Farmacología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Jul;153:112229. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112229. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

The hen's egg test on chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) is one of the most frequently used alternative tests for prediction of ocular irritation of cosmetic products. There are different HET-CAM protocols widely accepted, but there is no information about which of the protocols better correlates with the results obtained in product use clinical study under the conditions of use. Two Fix Time Methods (FTM) -Lüepke and the ICCVAM guideline - and two Reaction Time Methods (RTM) -ECVAM DBALM Prot. No. 47 and No. 96- were employed to test 18 cosmetic products. Simultaneously, they were evaluated by an ophthalmological clinical test. A unified classification system was used, and products were classified into four irritation levels: non-irritant, weak, moderate and severe irritant. The duration of use (rinse-off or leave-on), and the concentration and type of surfactants were taken into account in the analysis. All the products that were classified as non-irritant by any HET-CAM protocols were also safe in the product use clinical study. The product that was found to be non-safe in the product use clinical evaluation was also unsuitable by most of the HET-CAM protocols. These results were employed to develop an algorithm that allows selecting the appropriate HET-CAM protocol for each type of product to be tested.

摘要

鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(HET-CAM)试验是预测化妆品眼部刺激性最常用的替代试验之一。有不同的广泛接受的 HET-CAM 方案,但没有关于哪种方案与使用条件下产品使用临床研究中获得的结果相关性更好的信息。本研究采用两种固定时间法(FTM)——Lüepke 和 ICCVAM 指南——和两种反应时间法(RTM)——ECVAM DBALM Prot. No. 47 和 No. 96——测试了 18 种化妆品。同时,它们还通过眼科临床测试进行了评估。使用了统一的分类系统,根据刺激性将产品分为四个等级:非刺激性、轻度刺激性、中度刺激性和重度刺激性。在分析中考虑了使用时间(冲洗或停留)、表面活性剂的浓度和类型。所有通过任何 HET-CAM 方案分类为非刺激性的产品在产品使用临床研究中也是安全的。在产品使用临床评估中被发现不安全的产品也不适合大多数 HET-CAM 方案。这些结果被用于开发一种算法,该算法允许为要测试的每种类型的产品选择合适的 HET-CAM 方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验