Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, MCL 2-405, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph Health Care, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01337-2.
The elderly population is highly susceptible to develop post-operative complications after major surgeries. It is not clear whether the comprehensive geriatric care models are effective in reducing adverse events. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether the comprehensive geriatric care models improved clinical outcomes, particularly in decreasing the prevalence of delirium and length of hospital stay (LOS) in elderly surgical patients.
We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Emcare Nursing, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials. Gov, and ICTRP between 2009 to January 23, 2020. We included studies on geriatric care models in elderly patients (≥60 years) undergoing elective, non-cardiac high-risk surgery. The outcomes were the prevalence of delirium, LOS, rates of 30-days readmission, and 30-days mortality. We used the Cochrane Review Manager Version 5.3. to estimate the pooled Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) using random effect model analysis.
Eleven studies were included with 2672 patients [Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): 4; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials (Non-RCTs): 7]. Data pooled from six studies showed that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of delirium between the intervention and control groups: 13.8% vs 15.9% (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.30-1.96; p = 0.57). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the LOS (MD: -0.55; 95% CI: - 2.28, 1.18; p = 0.53), 30-day readmission (12.1% vs. 14.3%; OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.67-1.77; p = 0.73), and 30-day mortality (3.2% vs. 2.1%; OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.66-2.69; p = 0.42). The quality of evidence was very low.
The geriatric care models involved pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment, and intervention tools to address cognition, frailty, and functional status. In non-cardiac high-risk surgeries, these care models did not show any significant difference in the prevalence of delirium, LOS, 30-days readmission rates, and 30-day mortality in geriatric patients. Further RCTs are warranted to evaluate these models on the postoperative outcomes.
PROSPERO registration number - CRD42020181779 .
老年人在接受大手术后极易发生术后并发症。目前尚不清楚综合老年护理模式是否能有效减少不良事件。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定综合老年护理模式是否改善了临床结局,特别是降低老年手术患者的谵妄发生率和住院时间(LOS)。
我们检索了 Medline、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Emcare 护理、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ICTRP,检索时间为 2009 年至 2020 年 1 月 23 日。我们纳入了针对接受择期、非心脏高危手术的老年患者(≥60 岁)的老年护理模式的研究。主要结局为谵妄发生率、LOS、30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率。我们使用 Cochrane 评论管理软件 5.3 版,采用随机效应模型分析,估算合并后的优势比(OR)和均数差(MD)。
纳入了 11 项研究,共 2672 名患者[随机对照试验(RCTs):4 项;非随机对照试验(Non-RCTs):7 项]。6 项研究的数据表明,干预组和对照组之间的谵妄发生率无显著差异:13.8%比 15.9%(OR:0.76;95% CI:0.30-1.96;p=0.57)。同样,两组之间 LOS 也无显著差异(MD:-0.55;95% CI:-2.28,1.18;p=0.53)、30 天再入院率(12.1%比 14.3%;OR:1.09;95% CI:0.67-1.77;p=0.73)和 30 天死亡率(3.2%比 2.1%;OR:1.34;95% CI:0.66-2.69;p=0.42)。证据质量为极低。
老年护理模式包括术前全面老年评估和干预工具,以解决认知、虚弱和功能状态问题。在非心脏高危手术中,这些护理模式在老年患者的谵妄发生率、LOS、30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率方面没有显示出显著差异。需要进一步的 RCT 来评估这些模式的术后结局。
PROSPERO 注册号 - CRD42020181779 。