• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择会增加非工具性信息的价值。

Choosing increases the value of non-instrumental information.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia.

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88031-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-88031-y
PMID:33888764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062497/
Abstract

Curiosity pervades all aspects of human behaviour and decision-making. Recent research indicates that the value of information is determined by its propensity to reduce uncertainty, and the hedonic value of the outcomes it predicts. Previous findings also indicate a preference for options that are freely chosen, compared to equivalently valued alternatives that are externally assigned. Here, we asked whether the value of information also varies as a function of self- or externally-imposed choices. Participants rated their preference for information that followed either a self-chosen decision, or an externally imposed condition. Our results showed that choosing a lottery significantly increased the subjective value of information about the outcome. Computational modelling indicated that this change in information-seeking behaviour was not due to changes in the subjective probability of winning, but instead reflected an independent effect of choosing on the value of resolving uncertainty. These results demonstrate that agency over a prospect is an important source of information value.

摘要

好奇心渗透在人类行为和决策的各个方面。最近的研究表明,信息的价值取决于其降低不确定性的倾向,以及它预测的结果的享乐价值。之前的研究结果还表明,人们更喜欢自由选择的选项,而不是具有同等价值但由外部分配的选项。在这里,我们想知道信息的价值是否也会随自定或外部选择而变化。参与者对以下两种信息的偏好进行了评价:一种是根据自己的决定,另一种是根据外部强加的条件。我们的结果表明,选择彩票显著增加了对结果的信息的主观价值。计算模型表明,这种信息寻求行为的变化不是由于获胜的主观概率的变化,而是反映了选择对解决不确定性的价值的独立影响。这些结果表明,对前景的控制是信息价值的一个重要来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e5/8062497/ffc9be51cc2c/41598_2021_88031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e5/8062497/ffc9be51cc2c/41598_2021_88031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e5/8062497/ffc9be51cc2c/41598_2021_88031_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Choosing increases the value of non-instrumental information.选择会增加非工具性信息的价值。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88031-y.
2
Intrinsic Valuation of Information in Decision Making under Uncertainty.不确定性下决策中信息的内在估值
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jul 14;12(7):e1005020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005020. eCollection 2016 Jul.
3
Curiosity evolves as information unfolds.好奇心随着信息的展开而不断发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2301974120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301974120. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Subjective estimates of uncertainty during gambling and impulsivity after subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.赌博时的主观不确定性估计和帕金森病患者接受丘脑底核深部脑刺激后的冲动性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51164-2.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
6
Choice Boosts Curiosity.选择激发好奇心。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;34(1):99-110. doi: 10.1177/09567976221082637. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
7
Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.
8
The availability of non-instrumental information increases risky decision-making.非工具性信息的可得性会增加冒险型决策。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1975-1987. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02279-1. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
9
Neural correlates of valence-dependent belief and value updating during uncertainty reduction: An fNIRS study.在不确定性减少过程中,价值相关的信念和价值更新的神经关联:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Neuroimage. 2023 Oct 1;279:120327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120327. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
10
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice.揭示多选项选择背后的计算机制。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e57012. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57012.

引用本文的文献

1
The Value of Non-Instrumental Information in Anxiety: Insights from a Resource-Rational Model of Planning.焦虑中非工具性信息的价值:来自规划的资源理性模型的见解。
Comput Psychiatr. 2025 Feb 12;9(1):63-75. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.124. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural dynamics underlying the illusion of control during reward processing.奖励加工过程中控制错觉的神经动力学基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Oct 10;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae063.
3
Non-instrumental information seeking is resistant to acute stress.非工具性信息寻求对急性应激具有抵抗性。

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Dissociable Motivational Deficits in Pre-manifest Huntington's Disease.亨廷顿病前患者的动机分离缺陷。
Cell Rep Med. 2020 Nov 30;1(9):100152. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100152. eCollection 2020 Dec 22.
3
Anxious and obsessive-compulsive traits are independently associated with valuation of noninstrumental information.焦虑和强迫特质与非工具性信息的估值独立相关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46766-w.
4
Curiosity evolves as information unfolds.好奇心随着信息的展开而不断发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2301974120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301974120. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
When knowledge hurts: humans are willing to receive pain for obtaining non-instrumental information.当知识带来伤害:人类愿意为获取非工具性信息而承受痛苦。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20231175. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1175.
6
Hedonism as a motive for information search: biased information-seeking leads to biased beliefs.享乐主义作为信息搜索的动机:有偏差的信息寻求会导致有偏差的信念。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29429-8.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):739-755. doi: 10.1037/xge0000966. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.选择我们喜欢的与喜欢我们选择的:选择诱发偏好改变如何真正对决策起到工具性作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0231081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231081. eCollection 2020.
5
How people decide what they want to know.人们如何决定他们想知道什么。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):14-19. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Common neural code for reward and information value.奖励和信息价值的通用神经代码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 25;116(26):13061-13066. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820145116. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Diverse motives for human curiosity.人类好奇心的多样性动机。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):587-595. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0589-3. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.艰难的决策塑造偏好的神经编码。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 23;39(4):718-726. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1681-18.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry.中脑边缘奖赏回路中知识和无知的价值评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):E7255-E7264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800547115. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
The neural encoding of information prediction errors during non-instrumental information seeking.非工具性信息寻求过程中信息预测误差的神经编码。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 17;8(1):6134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24566-x.