• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门与传统全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:基于 IDEAL 框架实施

Transanal versus conventional total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the IDEAL framework for implementation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab002.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrab002
PMID:33889949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is an innovative technique for distal rectal cancer dissection. It has been shown to have similar short-term outcomes to conventional open and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (cTME), but recent studies have raised concern about increased morbidity and local recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes after TaTME versus cTME for rectal cancer.

METHODS

TaTME was implemented in 2014 using IDEAL principles in a single institution. The institution maintains databases for all patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. This retrospective review compared data collected from all patients who had TaTME with those from a propensity-matched cohort of patients who underwent cTME. The primary outcome was a composite pathological measure combining margin status and quality of total mesorectal excision (TME). Short-term clinical and survival outcomes were also measured.

RESULTS

Propensity matching created 109 matched pairs for analysis. Nine patients (8.3 per cent) undergoing TaTME had positive margins and/or incomplete TME, compared with 11 (10.5 per cent) undergoing cTME (P = 0.65). There were no significant differences in morbidity between the TaTME and cTME groups, including number of anastomotic leaks (13.8 versus 18.3 per cent; P = 0.37). The estimated 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 96.3 per cent in both groups (P = 0.39). Estimated 3-year overall (93.6 per cent for TaTME versus 94.5 per cent for cTME; P = 0.09) and disease-free (88.1 versus 76.1 per cent; P = 0.90) survival rates were similar.

CONCLUSION

TaTME provided similar outcomes to cTME for rectal cancer with the application of IDEAL principles.

摘要

背景

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)是一种用于低位直肠癌的创新手术技术。它的短期疗效与传统的开腹和腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(cTME)相似,但最近的研究对其增加的发病率和局部复发率表示担忧。本研究旨在评估 TaTME 与 cTME 治疗直肠癌的结果。

方法

2014 年,我们在一家机构中按照 IDEAL 原则实施 TaTME。该机构为所有接受直肠癌手术的患者建立了数据库。本回顾性研究比较了接受 TaTME 的所有患者的数据和接受 cTME 的具有倾向性匹配队列患者的数据。主要结果是结合切缘状态和全直肠系膜切除(TME)质量的复合病理测量。还测量了短期临床和生存结果。

结果

倾向性匹配创建了 109 对匹配的分析。9 例(8.3%)接受 TaTME 的患者存在阳性边缘和/或 TME 不完整,而 11 例(10.5%)接受 cTME 的患者存在阳性边缘和/或 TME 不完整(P=0.65)。TaTME 和 cTME 组之间的发病率没有显著差异,包括吻合口漏的数量(分别为 13.8%和 18.3%;P=0.37)。两组的估计 3 年局部无复发生存率分别为 96.3%(P=0.39)。估计 3 年总生存率(TaTME 为 93.6%,cTME 为 94.5%;P=0.09)和无病生存率(88.1%和 76.1%;P=0.90)相似。

结论

在应用 IDEAL 原则的情况下,TaTME 为直肠癌提供了与 cTME 相似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/8062257/3c368e5aa365/zrab002f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/8062257/2ea1058243e0/zrab002f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/8062257/3c368e5aa365/zrab002f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/8062257/2ea1058243e0/zrab002f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/8062257/3c368e5aa365/zrab002f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Transanal versus conventional total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the IDEAL framework for implementation.经肛门与传统全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:基于 IDEAL 框架实施
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab002.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人辅助与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:短期结局的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1380-1387. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab233.
3
Short-term outcomes of transanal completion total mesorectal excision (cTaTME) for rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除(cTaTME)治疗直肠癌的短期疗效:病例匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):103-109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6280-3. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).国际多中心前瞻性直肠癌手术审计;手术方法与结果,包括经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20 Suppl 6:33-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.14376.
8
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
9
Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: A case matched study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项病例匹配研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1019-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.131. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门和腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;20(4):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1421-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.在择期结直肠手术中使用电动圆形吻合器后吻合口漏的发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5541-5546. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11082-5. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Challenges and Learning Curves in Adopting TaTME and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cusum Analysis.采用经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)和机器人手术治疗直肠癌的挑战与学习曲线:累积和分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;14(20):5089. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205089.

本文引用的文献

1
Canadian taTME expert collaboration (CaTaCO) position statement.加拿大经肛全直肠系膜切除术专家协作组(CaTaCO)立场声明。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3748-3753. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07680-8. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
2
Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.局部区域性复发后经肛门全直肠系膜切除术直肠癌实施过程中。
Br J Surg. 2020 Aug;107(9):1211-1220. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11525. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
3
Experience beyond the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and its effect on the incidence of anastomotic leak.
经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)学习曲线之外的经验及其对吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Apr;24(4):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02160-6. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentric cohort study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:一项多中心队列研究。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Nov 8;8(1):36-41. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goz049. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Local Recurrence After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌后的局部复发:一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):359-366. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003757.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.挪威暂停经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):121-130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Norway versus The Netherlands: will taTME stand the test of time?挪威与荷兰:经肛全直肠系膜切除术能否经受时间的考验?
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):803-806. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02097-5. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02094-8. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
Rectal cancer treatment by transanal total mesorectal excision: Results in 100 consecutive patients.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:100例连续病例的结果
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Nov;97(9):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision.挪威对经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的暂停令。
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1120-1121. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11287.