• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果。

Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, P.O. Box 9025, 6710 HN, Ede, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02094-8. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-019-02094-8
PMID:31599385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6791915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for mid and low rectal cancer has been shown to improve short-term outcomes, mostly due to lower conversion rates and with improved quality of the specimen. However, robust long-term oncological data supporting the encouraging clinical and pathological outcomes are lacking.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing TaTME with curative intent for mid or low rectal cancer in two referral centers in The Netherlands between January 2012 and April 2016 with a complete and minimum follow-up of 36 months were included. The primary outcome was local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival and development of metastasis.

RESULTS

There were 159 consecutive patients. Their mean age was 66.9 (10.2) years and 66.7% of all patients were men. Pathological analysis showed a complete mesorectum in 139 patients (87.4%), nearly complete in 16 (10.1%) and an incomplete mesorectum in 4 (2.5%). There was involvement of the CRM (< 1 mm) in one patient (0.6%) and no patients had involvement of the distal margin (< 5 mm). Final postoperative staging after neoadjuvant therapy was stage 0 in 11 patients (6.9%), stage I in 73 (45.9%), stage II in 31 (19.5%), stage III in 37 (23.3%) and stage IV in 7 (4.4%). The 3-year local recurrence rate was 2.0% and the 5-year local recurrence rate was 4.0%. Median time to local recurrence was 19.2 months. Distant metastases were found in 22 (13.8%) patients and were diagnosed after a median of 6.9 months (range 1.1-50.4) months. Disease-free survival was 92% at 3 years and 81% at 5 years. Overall survival was 83.6% at 3 years and 77.3% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up of the current cohort confirms the oncological safety and feasibility of TaTME in two high volume referral centers for rectal carcinoma. However, further robust and audited data must confirm current findings before widespread implementation of TaTME.

摘要

背景

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗中低位直肠癌,已证实可改善短期预后,主要原因是中转开腹率降低,标本质量改善。然而,支持令人鼓舞的临床和病理结果的长期、强有力的肿瘤学数据仍然缺乏。

方法

荷兰两家转诊中心 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 4 月期间,连续纳入 159 例接受 TaTME 治疗且有明确治愈意向的中低位直肠癌患者,随访时间至少 36 个月。主要结局为局部复发率。次要结局包括无病生存率、总生存率和转移发生率。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 66.9(10.2)岁,66.7%为男性。病理分析显示,139 例(87.4%)患者直肠系膜完整,16 例(10.1%)患者近全直肠系膜完整,4 例(2.5%)患者直肠系膜不完整。1 例(0.6%)患者环周切缘(CRM)受累(<1mm),无患者远端切缘(<5mm)受累。新辅助治疗后,最终术后分期为 0 期 11 例(6.9%),Ⅰ期 73 例(45.9%),Ⅱ期 31 例(19.5%),Ⅲ期 37 例(23.3%),Ⅳ期 7 例(4.4%)。3 年局部复发率为 2.0%,5 年局部复发率为 4.0%。中位局部复发时间为 19.2 个月。22 例(13.8%)患者发生远处转移,中位时间为 6.9 个月(1.1-50.4 个月)。3 年无病生存率为 92%,5 年无病生存率为 81%。3 年总生存率为 83.6%,5 年总生存率为 77.3%。

结论

目前队列的长期随访结果证实,在两家直肠腺癌高容量转诊中心,TaTME 具有肿瘤安全性和可行性。然而,在广泛实施 TaTME 之前,必须有更有力的、经过审核的数据来证实当前的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/a9805c58e8ed/10151_2019_2094_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/1f7cce6de314/10151_2019_2094_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/f3a93a1ed587/10151_2019_2094_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/a9805c58e8ed/10151_2019_2094_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/1f7cce6de314/10151_2019_2094_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/f3a93a1ed587/10151_2019_2094_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74a/6791915/a9805c58e8ed/10151_2019_2094_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02094-8. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
2
Association of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer.经肛全直肠系膜切除术与直肠癌局部复发的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36330.
3
Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1808-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:超越学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4101-4109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07172-4. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer.COLOR III:一项比较经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的多中心随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial from Two Centers.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:来自两个中心的比较性前瞻性临床试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):769-776. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0828. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
7
Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME.三种不同手术技术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)、腹腔镜 TME 和开腹 TME。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Organ preservation with chemoradiotherapy plus local excision for rectal cancer: 5-year results of the GRECCAR 2 randomised trial.直肠癌的放化疗联合局部切除保肛治疗:GRECCAR 2 随机试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;5(5):465-474. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30410-8. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for cancer located in the lower rectum: short- and mid-term results.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗低位直肠癌:短期和中期结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;41(4):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transanal vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer: The TaLaR Randomized Clinical Trial.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术及直肠癌3年无病生存率:TaLaR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):774-783. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24276.
2
Transanal total mesorectal excision: short- and long-term results of four certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:德国四家结直肠癌认证中心的短期和长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Aug 15;39(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04704-w.
3
Oncologic outcomes following transanal total mesorectal excision: the United States experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision.挪威对经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的暂停令。
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1120-1121. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11287.
2
Structured training pathway and proctoring; multicenter results of the implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in the Netherlands.结构化培训途径和监管;荷兰经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)实施的多中心结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06750-w. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
3
Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结果:美国经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3703-3715. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10896-7. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Is survival after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) worse than that after traditional total mesorectal excision? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)后的生存率是否低于传统全直肠系膜切除术后的生存率?一项回顾性倾向评分调整队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb 20;39(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04591-7.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision: single center study on risk factors for major complications.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:单中心主要并发症危险因素研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 19;13:1277979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277979. eCollection 2023.
6
Multicenter phase II trial of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: preliminary results.多中心Ⅱ期经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床研究:初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9483-9508. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10266-9. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
What Is the Comparative Efficacy of Surgical, Endoscopic, Transanal Resection, and Radiotherapy Modalities in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer?手术、内镜、经肛门切除术及放疗方式治疗直肠癌的疗效对比如何?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;11(16):2347. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162347.
8
Simple transanal total mesorectal resection versus laparoscopic transabdominal total mesorectal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective case-control study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜经腹全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的单中心回顾性病例对照研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jul 27;10:1171382. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1171382. eCollection 2023.
9
Essential updates 2020/2021: Advancing precision medicine for comprehensive rectal cancer treatment.2020/2021年重要更新:推进直肠癌综合治疗的精准医学
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Dec 27;7(2):198-215. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12646. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Impact of the approach on conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.微创保肛直肠全系膜切除术治疗直肠癌中转开腹的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 27;38(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04382-0.
经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):972-985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6527-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放直肠癌根治术后无病生存和局部复发:澳大利亚腹腔镜直肠癌随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021.
5
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.
6
A case of local recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision: a new form of port-site metastasis?经肛门全直肠系膜切除术后局部复发 1 例:一种新形式的切口转移?
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Apr;22(4):319-320. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1777-2. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:学习曲线评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Apr;22(4):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1771-8. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Incidence and Risk Factors for Anastomotic Failure in 1594 Patients Treated by Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry.经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗的 1594 例患者吻合口失败的发生率和危险因素:国际 TaTME 注册研究结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):700-711. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002653.
9
St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision.圣加仑共识:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的安全实施
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1091-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5990-2. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
An assessment of an Australasian pathway for the introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME).评估澳大利亚-新西兰经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)引入路径。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;20(1):O1-O6. doi: 10.1111/codi.13964.